On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:34:56PM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > Sounds good. Maybe we should provide a description of this technique
> > somewhere within webml or ddp.
> >
> > WWW/doc folks: any hint about sponsorship uploading practices?
> At least an FAQ would be apropriate in my opinion.
> A
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Since the person who upload the package is not the maintainer, it is actually
> a
> non-maintainer upload, isn't it ?
No, the maintainer of the package is the person who gets sponsored (he's
the maintainer of this package although he isn't yet an
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:18:05AM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > So, dear co-developers, please join debian-mentors@lists.debian.org and
> > respond to future maintainers, and sponsor those who are asking it.
> > Also check out the sponsor page tha
Le Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:15:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG écrivait:
> A brief question. QA often requires saying "you volunteered to take
> over maintenance of foo, but nothing has happened in a while". A
> frequent response is "I need a sponsor"; occasionally there's "I'm
> having trouble g
On 9 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>...
> Is there an easy web page to point people at, where people could
> request sponsorship and sponsors could advertise their availability?
That's exactly what [1] is for (BTW: there's a link to this page from the
Developers' Corner [2]).
cu
Adrian
A brief question. QA often requires saying "you volunteered to take
over maintenance of foo, but nothing has happened in a while". A
frequent response is "I need a sponsor"; occasionally there's "I'm
having trouble getting in touch with my sponsor".
Is there an easy web page to point people at,
Le Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:18:05AM +0100, Tille, Andreas écrivait:
> OK. If I understand this right that would mean that the control file
> would state
>
> Maintainer: Future Maintainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> and my own address will be in the changelog (like in an NMU).
No, you don't need to
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:00:28 +0100 (CET)
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The way I prefer is:
>
> The maintainer makes the package as if he was an official developer.
> The sponsor rebuilds the package, checks it, and if it's OK he signs it
> with his key (using "debsign -m") and uploads
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Sounds good. Maybe we should provide a description of this technique
> somewhere within webml or ddp.
>
> WWW/doc folks: any hint about sponsorship uploading practices?
At least an FAQ would be apropriate in my opinion.
A better solution would be
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:00:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Tille, Andreas wrote:
>
> >...
> > OK. If I understand this right that would mean that the control file
> > would state
> >
> > Maintainer: Future Maintainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> no, the control field states:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Tille, Andreas wrote:
>...
> OK. If I understand this right that would mean that the control file
> would state
>
> Maintainer: Future Maintainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
no, the control field states:
Maintainer: My Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Where "My Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:18:05AM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> OK. If I understand this right that would mean that the control file
> would state
>
> Maintainer: Future Maintainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> and my own address will be in the changelog (like in an NMU). Where
> is the place to
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> So, dear co-developers, please join debian-mentors@lists.debian.org and
> respond to future maintainers, and sponsor those who are asking it.
> Also check out the sponsor page that is listing about 30 future
> maintainers who are looking for a sponsor :
13 matches
Mail list logo
