Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-28 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 12:19:44AM +, Mark Brown wrote: > While the userland binaries appear to work fine, the PCMCIA kernel module > source in slink will not build with 2.2 kernels. Version 3.0.8 fixes > this. This appears to be a minor problem. I just put -DEXPORT_SYMTAB into clients/Makef

Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-27 Thread Dale E. Martin
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 07:59:29PM +0100, Remco van de Meent wrote: > > I just discovered, unfortunately, that you need the util-linux package from > > potato (unstable). Rest of the things in slink are fine with 2.2.0!! > > Why's that? I'm using the o

Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-27 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 07:40:21PM +0100, Remco van de Meent wrote: > - Pcmcia-cs 3.0.6 ; cardmgr -V While the userland binaries appear to work fine, the PCMCIA kernel module source in slink will not build with 2.2 kernels. Version 3.0.8 fixes this. -- Mark Brown mai

Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-26 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Peter S Galbraith wrote: > kerneld is replaced by something else, etc. Kerneld is replaced by a kernel thread, so it has become obsolete. The modutils package in slink has been able to handle that change for quite a while now. Wichert. -- =

Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-26 Thread Raul Miller
Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because I, like every other user should do, read the documentation, and thus > read you need util-linux 2.9g. And if it works for you with lower versions, > does it always work? Yes, maybe, no, maybe not. I don't even want to take > the risk of 'yes i

Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-26 Thread Remco van de Meent
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > I just discovered, unfortunately, that you need the util-linux package > > from potato (unstable). Rest of the things in slink are fine with > > 2.2.0!! > > Why's that? I'm using the one from slink with 2.2.0 and it works just > fine. I've been running 2.2.0-pre6 for a co

Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 07:59:29PM +0100, Remco van de Meent wrote: > I just discovered, unfortunately, that you need the util-linux package from > potato (unstable). Rest of the things in slink are fine with 2.2.0!! Why's that? I'm using the one from slink with 2.2.0 and it works just fine. I've

Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-26 Thread Remco van de Meent
Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > modutils, gcc, binutils, libc5, libc6, ldso, procps, sysutils, psmisc, > > hostname, loadlin, shellutils, autofs, nfs-server, bash, ncpfs, > > pcmcia-cs, ppp, util-linux. > > > > If you get the versions of these packages that are in the currently > > frozen Debian dist

Re: What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-26 Thread Remco van de Meent
Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Will some guru tell us what critical packages we need to update in order > to use 2.2 ? I'm not a guru I guess, but I can cut&paste something from linux/Documentation/Changes: - Kernel modules 2.1.121 ; insmod -V - Gnu C 2.7.2.3

What's needed for kernel 2.2

1999-01-26 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Will some guru tell us what critical packages we need to update in order to use 2.2 ? kerneld is replaced by something else, etc. I guess that if I'm asking that means I should wait for a proper Debian upgrade. Or does kernel-image-2.2.0-i686_2.2.0-1_i386.deb have all the dependencies sorted out