Re: What's wrong with meta-gnome2 ?

2009-06-22 Thread Olivier Berger
Le lundi 22 juin 2009 à 03:51 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org (21/06/2009): [Copying the original poster because I'm not certain he's subscribed; apologies for any resulting duplication.] [AFAICT, he is, since he replied in some threads previously. ;)] Sure

Re: What's wrong with meta-gnome2 ?

2009-06-22 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2009-06-22, Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu wrote: Following Joss's mail to -release@, the following answer came: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/06/msg00216.html OK... so, how comes these dependencies aren't reflected in

What's wrong with meta-gnome2 ?

2009-06-21 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=meta-gnome2;expand=1 : Why is package X not in testing yet? Checking meta-gnome2 trying to update meta-gnome2 from 1:2.24.3~2 to 1:2.24.3~3 (candidate is 11 days old) Updating meta-gnome2 makes 1 non-depending

Re: What's wrong with meta-gnome2 ?

2009-06-21 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
[Copying the original poster because I'm not certain he's subscribed; apologies for any resulting duplication.] Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu writes: Updating meta-gnome2 makes 1 non-depending packages uninstallable on i386: gnome-desktop-environment

Re: What's wrong with meta-gnome2 ?

2009-06-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org (21/06/2009): [Copying the original poster because I'm not certain he's subscribed; apologies for any resulting duplication.] [AFAICT, he is, since he replied in some threads previously. ;)] I agree that this message is not as clear as it could be. In practice,