Re: What's wrong with update-excuses?

2006-01-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:50:12PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: > > Hi, > > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base > > > > says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which > > was uploaded on Jan 18th: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-

Re: What's wrong with update-excuses?

2006-01-23 Thread Luk Claes
Frank Küster wrote: > Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Frank Küster wrote: >>>http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base >>> >>>says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which >>>was uploaded on Jan 18th: >>> >>>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-ch

Re: What's wrong with update-excuses?

2006-01-23 Thread Frank Küster
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi > >> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base >> >> says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which >> was uploaded on Jan 18th: >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/0

Re: What's wrong with update-excuses?

2006-01-23 Thread Luk Claes
Frank Küster wrote: > Hi, Hi > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base > > says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which > was uploaded on Jan 18th: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/01/msg01818.html > > Is this just a bug in the qa s

What's wrong with update-excuses?

2006-01-23 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base says that tetex-base is 0 days old. However, unstable has 3.0-13 which was uploaded on Jan 18th: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/01/msg01818.html Is this just a bug in the qa scripts, or worse? Regards, Frank -- Fran