Re: Why does gcc no longer link .sos with -lc by default?

1997-12-10 Thread Roman Hodek
The difference seems to be that the gcc on the alpha is linking in -lgcc -lc -lgcc, where gcc on the i386 is just doing -lgcc twice. So which is right, and if it's the i386, since moving to gcc-2.7.2.3 isn't an option for the alphw, does anyone know enough about specs files to be able to

Re: Why does gcc no longer link .sos with -lc by default?

1997-12-10 Thread Stephen Zander
Michael Alan Dorman wrote: The difference seems to be that the gcc on the alpha is linking in -lgcc -lc -lgcc, where gcc on the i386 is just doing -lgcc twice. So which is right, and if it's the i386, since moving to gcc-2.7.2.3 isn't an option for the alphw, does anyone know enough about

Why does gcc no longer link .sos with -lc by default?

1997-12-09 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
In building a couple of perl extensions for Debian the other day, I noticed that the version on the axp produced a dependency on the loader and libc. When I moved the same source over to my i386, I was told that the resulting shared object was statically linked. After a bit of puttering around,