>> > 'rolling' is a statement by the project that we consider 'testing'
>> > (renamed to 'rolling')
>> Why the heck do we start by renaming testing? This will seriously
>> disrupt service for anyone for DAYS. There are just too many places
>> tools are using "testing" hardcoded. Too many users havi
* Lucas Nussbaum [2011-05-02 11:32]:
> How much of that would apply if we renamed testing to rolling (because
> it reinforces the PR message), but kept a symlink from testing to
> rolling?
If you want that you need a GR as it overrides a delegate decision.
And I predict I'm not the only one wh
On 02/05/11 at 10:12 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi
>
> Picking one piece that really leaves me "WTF?" out of this
> way-too-long-thread. Happens to be a post by Lucas, but could be anyone
> else too.
>
> > 'rolling' is a statement by the project that we consider 'testing'
> > (renamed to 'roll
Hi
Picking one piece that really leaves me "WTF?" out of this
way-too-long-thread. Happens to be a post by Lucas, but could be anyone
else too.
> 'rolling' is a statement by the project that we consider 'testing'
> (renamed to 'rolling')
Why the heck do we start by renaming testing? This will se
4 matches
Mail list logo
