On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:32:08 +0200, Michelle Konzack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2006-10-06 18:06:47, schrieb Mikhail Gusarov:
Do aptitude checks terminal even for 'aptitude install' or 'aptitude
search'?
Good question! The two offending Servers use Monocrom-Graficcards.
Maybe aptitude can not
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:32:08PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-10-06 18:06:47, schrieb Mikhail Gusarov:
Do aptitude checks terminal even for 'aptitude install' or 'aptitude
search'?
Good question! The two offending Servers use Monocrom-Graficcards.
Maybe aptitude can not enter
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006, Jan Kechel wrote:
Brian May wrote:
Jan == Jan Kechel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan I wrote a little perl-script:
How does this compare with deborphan?
deborphan shows you the 'leave' packages of your dependency-tree
apt-findremovable checks for a
Peter Palfrader wrote:
Ever tried the simulate button in the orphaner frontend? I don't know
apt-findremovable's UI but I very much like orphaner's. But then I
might be just slightly biased. :)
don't care about apt-findremovable anymore, debfoster does it's job much
better :)
Peter
Jan
Am 2006-10-06 12:34:35, schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:42:43AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
And HOW do you install/remove packages if the TUI from aptitude crashs?
You file a bug at the appropriate severity against aptitude?
A bugreport about what?
If I tell the
Am 2006-10-06 18:06:47, schrieb Mikhail Gusarov:
Do aptitude checks terminal even for 'aptitude install' or 'aptitude
search'?
Good question! The two offending Servers use Monocrom-Graficcards.
Maybe aptitude can not enter a colormode and crash?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:30:33PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
If aptitude kills your ssh session, I'd be inclined to believe more was
wrong
on your machine than just aptitude, but I guess that's up to whoever ends up
debugging this to find out.
The problem is, that the Servers
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:30:33PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
If I tell the Maintainer: I am connecting over ssh2 using keys
to two of my servers in Tehran, I want to install something and
I choose aptitude for better searching, aptitude crashs and kill
the ssh session, he/she will close
Am 2006-10-03 16:26:46, schrieb Michal Cihar:
deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe. Anyway if you use
aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you
don't have to guess.
...and if you have a computer on which aptitude do not want to run
in the terminal? I have
Am 2006-10-04 16:00:28, schrieb Mike Hommey:
Interesting... here, it tends to be the contrary. apt-get wants to
install a whole lot of packages on dist-upgrade, while aptitude is able
to pull the minimum required.
Not here. Only the bare minimum.
[ '/etc/apt/apt.conf'
Am 2006-10-04 18:08:50, schrieb Alexey Feldgendler:
Why not just stop using apt-get? aptitude can do everything the
same as apt-get and even supports the same command line parameters.
And HOW do you install/remove packages if the TUI from aptitude crashs?
I do not know how aptitude is working
Am 2006-10-04 15:38:18, schrieb Rolf Kutz:
apt-get is faster and uses less resources.
I have a IBM TP760ED (233Mhz, 128 MB) where aptitude
need arround 3 minutes to let me do anything...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:42:43AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
And HOW do you install/remove packages if the TUI from aptitude crashs?
You file a bug at the appropriate severity against aptitude?
I do not know how aptitude is working and whether it use ncurses or
slang but it segfaults all
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
MK ...and if you have a computer on which aptitude do not want to
MK run in the terminal? I have two Servers where this is the case.
Do aptitude checks terminal even for 'aptitude install' or 'aptitude
search'?
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am 2006-10-04 18:08:50, schrieb Alexey Feldgendler:
Why not just stop using apt-get? aptitude can do everything the
same as apt-get and even supports the same command line
parameters.
And HOW do you install/remove packages if the TUI from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Brian May wrote:
Jan == Jan Kechel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan I wrote a little perl-script:
How does this compare with deborphan?
deborphan shows you the 'leave' packages of your dependency-tree
apt-findremovable checks for a
* Quoting Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:13:49PM +0200, Jan Kechel wrote:
I always had the problem, that if I removed a package via apt-get
remove, that there were still other packages that only were installed
because of that package.
Use aptitude
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
Cool, didn't know that.
But it doesn't work for packages that are already installed via apt-get.
I guess I'll use aptitude instead of apt-get from now on, and try to
cleanup via apt-findremovable :)
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:07:02 +0700, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
apt-findremovable.
I would rather appreciate that apt-get and aptitude share the information
of which packages have been explicitely installed and which have
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:07:02 +0700, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
apt-findremovable.
I would rather appreciate that apt-get and aptitude share the information
of which
Hello!
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:08:50 +0200, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:07:02 +0700, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
apt-findremovable.
I would rather appreciate that apt-get and aptitude share the
Hi,
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 13:08, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
Why not just stop using apt-get? aptitude can do everything the same as
apt-get and even supports the same command line parameters.
aptitude neither understand build-dep nor source as command...
regards,
Holger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
aptitude has this
apt has that
aptitude can't do that
apt can't do this
[...]
.. is this always here like this?
Isn't it just that some prefer apt and some aptitude, and that of course
those that prefer aptitude think that
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:46:39PM +0200, Jan Kechel wrote:
Isn't it just that some prefer apt and some aptitude, and that of course
those that prefer aptitude think that apt-findremovable is obsolete, and
that those that prefer apt not?
Just a bit more nitpicking: apt is different from
* Quoting Alexey Feldgendler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:07:02 +0700, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
apt-findremovable.
I would rather appreciate that apt-get and aptitude share the information
of which
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:50:59PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:07:02 +0700, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
apt-findremovable.
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I would rather appreciate that apt-get and aptitude share the information
of which packages have been explicitely installed and which have been
automatically installed.
I often install packages to play with them a little or just
Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:23:21PM +0700, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
Seems like debfoster does what you need. However, it's considered obsolete
now that aptitude takes care of unused packages.
debfoster (2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
Jan == Jan Kechel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan I wrote a little perl-script:
How does this compare with deborphan?
Package: deborphan
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Installed-Size: 176
Maintainer: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.7.15
Depends: libc6 (=
Alexey == Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexey On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:07:02 +0700, Raphael Hertzog
Alexey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
apt-findremovable.
I would rather appreciate that apt-get and aptitude
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi,
I hope this is the right mailinglist for this.
I always had the problem, that if I removed a package via apt-get
remove, that there were still other packages that only were installed
because of that package.
I wrote a little perl-script:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:13:49PM +0200, Jan Kechel wrote:
I always had the problem, that if I removed a package via apt-get
remove, that there were still other packages that only were installed
because of that package.
Use aptitude -- it has had this functionality for quite a while now.
/*
Hi
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:13:49 +0200
Jan Kechel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does a tool like this already exist?
deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe. Anyway if you use
aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you
don't have to guess.
--
Michal Čihař |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michal Čihař wrote:
deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe.
yeah, similar, also it finds only the leaves, while apt-findremovable
checks which depends have no other rdepends than the specified one
Anyway if you use
aptitude instead of
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:54:09 +0700, Jan Kechel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe.
yeah, similar, also it finds only the leaves, while apt-findremovable
checks which depends have no other rdepends than the specified one
Seems like debfoster does what you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/06 09:54, Jan Kechel wrote:
Michal ihaY wrote:
deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe.
yeah, similar, also it finds only the leaves, while apt-findremovable
checks which depends have no other rdepends than the specified one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
apt-findremovable.
cool :)
I just released v0.2:
http://prevalent-digest.de/apt-findremovable/
.. it's getting slower (takes about 1min to complete),
but now it re-checks, if apt-cache
Jan Kechel:
Michal Čihař wrote:
Anyway if you use aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks
all that automatically and you don't have to guess.
Cool, didn't know that. But it doesn't work for
packages that are already installed via apt-get.
You can mark all packages as installed automatically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/06 11:01, Jan Kechel wrote:
Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
apt-findremovable.
cool :)
I just released v0.2:
http://prevalent-digest.de/apt-findremovable/
.. it's getting slower (takes about 1min to
Am Dienstag 03 Oktober 2006 16:26 schrieb Michal Čihař:
if you use
aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you
don't have to guess.
Only if you also installed the package-to-remove with aptitude.
HS
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:34:37 +0200
Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag 03 Oktober 2006 16:26 schrieb Michal Čihař:
if you use
aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you
don't have to guess.
Only if you also installed the package-to-remove with
#include hallo.h
* Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) [Tue, Oct 03 2006, 05:11:46PM]:
Jan Kechel:
Michal Čihař wrote:
Anyway if you use aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks
all that automatically and you don't have to guess.
Cool, didn't know that. But it doesn't work for
packages that are
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:23:21PM +0700, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
Seems like debfoster does what you need. However, it's considered obsolete
now that aptitude takes care of unused packages.
debfoster (2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version, new maintainer team.
* Revert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/06 13:37, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h * Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) [Tue, Oct 03 2006,
05:11:46PM]:
Jan Kechel:
Michal Čihař wrote:
[snip]
Aha... Ok... And how many cobolds do you need to kill to win that
game? (SCNR)
44 matches
Mail list logo
