On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:36:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> The pins are used to determine which of all the available versions for
> the package are candidates for installation, in Ludovic's case both the
> woody and unstable versions are candidates (both have pin > now).
In my case, th
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 06:21, Brian May wrote:
> I suspect this is a more general problem with apt-get that it assumes
> that if two versions of the same package are available from different
> sources, then both packages will be exactly the same. As such, it will
> always use the Packages entry fro
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 07:12:28PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Try to reorder your sources.list file.
So another words, it is not sufficient to simply disable an apt-get
source line by giving it a priority of -1, I must also delete that line
from sources.list too?
(as normally this entry is
Le mercredi 21 août 2002 à 13:28:30, Brian May a écrit:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I have just being playing around with apt-proxy, and noticed something
> weird. Every time I run apt-get, it wants to upgrade the packages it
> just upgraded 5 seconds ago (it only happens on this computer, too):
[..]
> scro
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:44:54PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Description: Dummy library package for Kerberos4 From KTH.
> > This is a dummy package. It should be safe to remove it.
> > installed-size: 76
> > source: krb4
If you mean the spacing is different, that is my fault (I use vim
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
> I ran dpkg-scanpackages on it myself, and haven't updated anything
> since (besides, if I had updated something, the MD5sum check would fail
> wouldn't it?)
Nope.
> Description: Dummy library package for Kerberos4 From KTH.
> This is a dummy package. It
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:18:09AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> If you do apt-cache show kerberos4kth1 after installing and look very
> carefully you will see that the two listed 1.1-11-2 stanzas are subtly
> different. The problem is that your package file does not
> accurately reflect the cont
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:19:13PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > apt-get knows that it has to get the file from:
> > >
> > > deb http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~ftp/debian woody main
> > >
> > > and the md5sum of the Packages file from this source, as q
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:19:13PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > apt-get knows that it has to get the file from:
> >
> > deb http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~ftp/debian woody main
> >
> > and the md5sum of the Packages file from this source, as quoted
> > before matches exactly.
>
> Er, the md5su
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:50:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > The entires in Packages files and those in the .deb must match exactly
> > (ie byte for byte), otherwise it sees them as different packages. Since
> > dpkg manipulates the status file and
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:50:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The entires in Packages files and those in the .deb must match exactly
> (ie byte for byte), otherwise it sees them as different packages. Since
> dpkg manipulates the status file and only has information from the .deb
> there is no
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
> Can't apt realize that if it is going to install a package from source
> X, it should use the Packages entry from source X too?
The entires in Packages files and those in the .deb must match exactly
(ie byte for byte), otherwise it sees them as different p
Hello,
I have just being playing around with apt-proxy, and noticed something
weird. Every time I run apt-get, it wants to upgrade the packages it
just upgraded 5 seconds ago (it only happens on this computer, too):
(note: se_apt-get is the same thing as apt-get, but sets
the selinux domain up co
13 matches
Mail list logo
