Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-24 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:06:49 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd love to see people migrating to Arch Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with

Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-22 Thread Amaya
Daniel Stone wrote: vim! emacs! And my cats looked out to see who was calling them... :) -- .''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll) : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.11 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com

arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-19 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:06:49 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd love to see people migrating to Arch Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian Weimer lists on

Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]: Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html I won't go

Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-19 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]: Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian Weimer lists on

Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-19 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]: Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html Looking over the

Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-19 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html Note that it's over a

Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]: Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian Weimer lists on

OT: Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

2005-08-19 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Daniel Stone wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]: Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS, arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of