On Mar 16, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page
is update, makedev, ld.so, modconf, modutils, netbase, pcmcia-cs,
procps, ppp, pppconfig,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Mar 16, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page
is update, makedev, ld.so, modconf, modutils,
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 20:12, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
What would really win, of course, is Architecture: !hurd-i386. But
negative declarations are currently not yet supported. They should
be.
Research the problem (especially on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-{dpkg,release}/, but also
To be in SCC, under the proposal we're all discussing, an arch must
have build 50% of the archive, not counting arch-specific packages.
The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page
is update, makedev,
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page is
update, makedev, ld.so, modconf, modutils, netbase, pcmcia-cs, procps,
ppp, pppconfig, setserial.
Pppconfig is not
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page is
update, makedev, ld.so, modconf, modutils, netbase, pcmcia-cs, procps,
ppp,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:12:29AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
To be in SCC, under the proposal we're all discussing, an arch must
have build 50% of the archive, not counting arch-specific packages.
The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
because they are
7 matches
Mail list logo
