On samedi 18 avril 2009 00:06:52 Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 19:14:14 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
I'm ready to do it but I think this makes more sense to submit the bug to
the upstream dev. Unfortunetely I couldn't find the web page of the
ifupdown upstream development.
On mercredi 08 avril 2009 04:42:38 Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 18:00:14 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
I was looking a method to just have ipv6 with autoconf network and
found this patch
http://mlblog.osdir.com/linux.debian.devel.ipv6/2005-05/msg00012.shtml
This
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 19:14:14 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
I'm ready to do it but I think this makes more sense to submit the bug to the
upstream dev. Unfortunetely I couldn't find the web page of the ifupdown
upstream development. It's not a software specific to debian, isn't it ?
The
Hi!
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 18:00:14 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
I was looking a method to just have ipv6 with autoconf network and
found this patch
http://mlblog.osdir.com/linux.debian.devel.ipv6/2005-05/msg00012.shtml
This link didn't seem to work, got this instead:
Hi all,
I was looking a method to just have ipv6 with autoconf network and found this
patch http://mlblog.osdir.com/linux.debian.devel.ipv6/2005-05/msg00012.shtml
Does anybody know the answer of upstream dev to this patch proposition ?
Regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
5 matches
Mail list logo
