remember:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html
well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of
chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether
chrooting bind should be a debconf option of the bind9 package, or
whether i
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:04:54AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
remember:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html
well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of
chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether
also sprach Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.01.15.0305 +0100]:
I vote yes for the Debconfy bit. I chroot it by hand, and I find it
insanely nifty, even though bind9 isn't plagued by the same security
problems bind is. Helps me sleep better at night, or something.
okay. what's your
3 matches
Mail list logo