Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-03 22:31]: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:28:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> And to be honest - you could have tried to check the Packages file you >> get from debian archive. > > What, you want the devel/people script to check the validity of the ema

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:28:22PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > And to be honest - you could have tried to check the Packages file you > get from debian archive. What, you want the devel/people script to check the validity of the emails in the Packages files? > But that was quite some days (we

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-03 21:06]: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: >> What I meant was: the page was apparently generated from local data >> (from a local /var/lib/dpkg/available perhaps?). > > And I said it _was not_. > > The broken package rea

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > > > Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 > > > > > > > > What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO. > > > >

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Josip! You wrote: > > > Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 > > > > > > What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO. > > > > Probably the script that generates this page is

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:47:41PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How the hell were you able to draw that conclusion? The script may be > broken, but that it would randomly insert local data into the web pages, > well that's just too stu

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:23:50AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > >From http://www.debian.org/devel/people, I see: > > > > Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 > > > > What's up with this? This is not a l

Re: bogus maintainers?

2002-01-03 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Thomas! You wrote: > >From http://www.debian.org/devel/people, I see: > > Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 > > What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO. Probably the scr

bogus maintainers?

2002-01-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
>From http://www.debian.org/devel/people, I see: Maintainer, Unknown Kernel Package <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> main: kernel-doc-2.4.5-r4k-kn04, kernel-source-2.4.5-r4k-kn04 What's up with this? This is not a legitimate maintainer address IMO. Thomas