Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To
Re: Eric Cooper in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
You mean, rather than
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:53 -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
On Nov 08, Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
It's the
Hi,
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-08 16:18]:
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:53 -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
It's certainly my
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
I think it's a
Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone have a suggestion about what to do when the maintainer
can't reproduce it and the reporter can only reproduce it on one
of his machines? I'm kind of stymied on #329333 for Autoconf.
No idea what the problem is here.
Well, the problem is that for
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered obnoxious?
It doesn't seem
Eric:
Miles Bader wrote:
Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose someone has reported a bug that the maintainer can't
reproduce, but the reporter can. Is it reasonable for the maintainer
to email the reporter and ask whether a new version fixes the problem,
or is that considered
10 matches
Mail list logo