Re: build question

2000-09-06 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on a woody box? You could do source only uploads. Roland -- Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL

Re: build question

2000-09-05 Thread Tom Cato Amundsen
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors, or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way, please. my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages there if

Re: build question

2000-09-05 Thread David Starner
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors, or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way, please. my main

Re: build question

2000-09-05 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: If possible, your package should depend on packages in potato only. Then users won't be forced to install other unstable packages, just to try out your package. What if your package won't compile against the libraries in woody?

Re: build question

2000-09-05 Thread Arthur Korn
David Starner schrieb: On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on

build question

2000-09-04 Thread michael d. ivey
i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors, or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way, please. my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on a woody box? --