On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote:
my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages
there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on a
woody box?
You could do source only uploads.
Roland
--
Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote:
i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors,
or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way,
please.
my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages
there if
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote:
i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors,
or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way,
please.
my main
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
If possible, your package should depend on packages in potato only.
Then users won't be forced to install other unstable packages,
just to try out your package.
What if your package won't compile against the libraries in woody?
David Starner schrieb:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote:
my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages
there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on
i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors,
or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way,
please.
my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages
there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on a
woody box?
--
6 matches
Mail list logo