Re: buildd stuff

2007-02-06 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:38:17PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:29:33 +0100, Wouter Verhelst > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >It's not that it's sacred; it's that w-b uses a Berkeley DB with a > >database-level lock for every access (including read-only access); so > >giving suc

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-31 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:29:33 +0100, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>It's not that it's sacred; it's that w-b uses a Berkeley DB with a >>database-level lock for every access (including read-only access); so >>giving such access to everyone who

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-30 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:29:33 +0100, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It's not that it's sacred; it's that w-b uses a Berkeley DB with a >database-level lock for every access (including read-only access); so >giving such access to everyone who asks for it will interfere with >proper build

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-30 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:40:00PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:04:12AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > > > Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >> One first step would be to keep the current build daemons maintainers >

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-30 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:04:12AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > There is no wb-amd64 nor wb-mipsel. I don't know why. Because for actual w-b access from buildd hosts, those groups are no longer used. Instead, there's a buildd_$arch user for every architecture on buildd.d.o, to which access is re

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-30 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:35:04AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > One first step would be to keep the current build daemons maintainers > > (ie the person who signs the upload), and give and access to some > > porters to the wanna-build databa

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : >> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> One first step would be to keep the current build daemons maintainers >>> (ie the person who signs the upload), and give and access to some >>> porters to the wanna-bui

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-30 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:04:12AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > You think wrong. Using the public ldap database, you can find the > following details: This access is only usable for people which have login access to ftp-master (or where the info currently is located). Even if I'm included into

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-29 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:04:12AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > > Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> One first step would be to keep the current build daemons maintainers > >> (ie the person who signs the upload), and give and access to some > >>

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:04:12AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > wb-i386: ajt, rmurray, troup, vorlon > wb-mips: ajt, rmurray, vorlon > There is no wb-amd64 nor wb-mipsel. I don't know why. amd64 is included in wb-i386; mipsel is included in wb-mips. Cheers, aj signature.asc Description: Digit

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-29 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> One first step would be to keep the current build daemons maintainers >> (ie the person who signs the upload), and give and access to some >> porters to the wanna-build database. This way they could reschedule >> fail

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One first step would be to keep the current build daemons maintainers > (ie the person who signs the upload), and give and access to some > porters to the wanna-build database. This way they could reschedule > failed builds, add dep-wait, or do binNMU.

Re: buildd stuff

2007-01-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:23:35AM +, James Troup wrote: >> unilaterally make the decision that they are or are not OK. If it's >> the consensus of the release managers and the architecture porting >> team that they want to use emulated buildds and/or cross compilin

buildd stuff (was: Re: update on binary upload restrictions)

2007-01-26 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:23:35AM +, James Troup wrote: > unilaterally make the decision that they are or are not OK. If it's > the consensus of the release managers and the architecture porting > team that they want to use emulated buildds and/or cross compiling, I > absolutely will not stop