Le dimanche 27 août 2006 à 19:12 +0200, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> bzrtools > 0.9 does not put files under /usr/lib/python2.4, since it
> uses python-support; and its maintainer scripts for < 0.9 did not
> bytecompile the modules, so the most plausible explanation for .pyc
> files in /usr/lib/python
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Brian May [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +1000]:
>
> > Adeodate> Also, do you remember having root
> > Adeodato> bzr as root?
>
> > Huh?
>
> Sorry, that should have read: "do you remember having *run* bzr as root".
> It's the most likely cause fo
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> writes:
Adeodato> Sorry, that should have read: "do you remember having
Adeodato> *run* bzr as root". It's the most likely cause for
Adeodato> those .pyc files to be there, since bzrtools did not.
No -
* Brian May [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +1000]:
> Adeodate> Also, do you remember having root
> Adeodato> bzr as root?
> Huh?
Sorry, that should have read: "do you remember having *run* bzr as root".
It's the most likely cause for those .pyc files to be there, since
bzrtools did not.
Tha
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> writes:
Adeodato> Hm. I'd say that you have .pyc files left in:
Adeodato>
Adeodato> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools
Adeodato> Can you check, please?
Yes, see below.
Ad
Version: 0.9-1
* Brian May [Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:43:24 +1000]:
> Robert> Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
> Robert> 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
> Robert> take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.
> >> Did I do somethin
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> writes:
Robert> Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
Robert> 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
Robert> take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.
>
* Brian May [Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:53:01 +1000]:
> > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robert> On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> >> Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
> >> appears to be converted successfully - i
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
>> Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
>> appears to be converted successfully - if I do a diff
>> operation, it reports all files as
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 15:59 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robert> On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> >> Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
> >> appears to be converted successfu
la, 2006-08-12 kello 15:59 +1000, Brian May kirjoitti:
> Are there any Debian packages of 0.9rc1 available?
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/bzr says 0.9~rc1-1.
(Lookup time: about ten seconds. :)
--
On a clear disk, you seek forever.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
>> Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
>> appears to be converted successfully - if I do a diff
>> operation, it reports all files as
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
>
> Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive appears
> to be converted successfully - if I do a diff operation, it reports
> all files as deleted, but if I try to revert it, it slows to a
> grinding halt.
Could you please
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Its likely to be a different bug - the conversion approach
Robert> used for svn/baz is very different. That said, conversion
Robert> from $any system is going to use more memory than native
Robert> bzr operations,
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 10:58 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robert> Are you doing conversions from SVN? Current bzr uses 20MB
> Robert> of ram to do a native branch operation in similar
> Robert> circumstances. (bug report gets
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Are you doing conversions from SVN? Current bzr uses 20MB
Robert> of ram to do a native branch operation in similar
Robert> circumstances. (bug report gets fixed, new at 11 :)).
No, this was a conversion from baz. Mi
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 09:56 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> For documentation on checkouts and bound branches, see
>
> http://bazaar-vcs.org/CheckoutTutorial
>
> http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrUsingBoundBranches
>
> However, I am not convinced the following paragraph in the first
> page is correct:
>
> "
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> writes:
Adeodato> But if you have a set of equal developers, bzr can be
Adeodato> also used in a very similar way to Subversion, where all
Adeodato> commits go to a central repository, and nobody has to
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
>> > will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
> > will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
> > can still be done without granting shell
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
> will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
> can still be done without granting shell access), or over plain http via
> an apache rewrite rule.
Is it al
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 22:29 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
>
> That's in fact an issue that made me feel sceptical about bzr, darcs
> and
> mercury. All of them require a shell account or some scripting through
> a
> special mail address to commit changes. And it's not only the recent
> kernel vu
Adeodato Simó, 2006-08-02 21:20:09 +0200 :
>> > % bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
[...]
> Ask in #alioth. Note, however, that TTBOMK still does not offer HTTP
> access, so if you want that, better stick to htdocs for a while.
>
> I hope to be able to bribe buxy to pr
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 21:44, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
> >> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all
> >> > the branching,
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
>
>> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
>> > branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
>> >
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
> > branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
> > they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
> >
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 19:44 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1936 +0100]:
> > Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
> > sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just make a
> > "checkout" (refe
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
> branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
> they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
>
> % bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
W
also sprach Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1936 +0100]:
> Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
> sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just make a
> "checkout" (refer to the bzr docs), and every commit you make will go to
> the mai
* Adeodato Simó [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:31:37 +0200]:
> they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
> % bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just ma
* Christoph Haas [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:33:15 +0200]:
Hi,
> No offense intended - honestly - but the problem of passing
> patches/patchsets around between the maintainers is really a problem. In
> Subversion I know where the authoritative instance lies that is the master
> instance keeping the c
31 matches
Mail list logo