Le May 16, 2008 09:10:35 am Lennart Sorensen, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:28:36PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > I don't see your point.
>
> I can have libfoo1 and libfoo2 installed and used at the same time so
> both applications compiled for libfoo1 and libfoo2 can be used
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:28:36PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I don't see your point.
I can have libfoo1 and libfoo2 installed and used at the same time so
both applications compiled for libfoo1 and libfoo2 can be used at the
same time. I can recompile my applications for libfoo2 as I get a
Le May 15, 2008 09:55:40 am Lennart Sorensen, vous avez écrit :
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 08:13:53PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Your second parenthesis is wrong. Just like LKM-s when the stock kernels'
> > ABINAME is bumped, applications need to be rebuilt when the ABI of one of
> > the lib
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 08:13:53PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Your second parenthesis is wrong. Just like LKM-s when the stock kernels'
> ABINAME is bumped, applications need to be rebuilt when the ABI of one of the
> libraries they link to changes in a way which is not backwards-compatible
Le May 14, 2008 09:41:02 am Lennart Sorensen, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:32:07PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > I don't follow you. iceweasel, for example, is not independent from, say,
> > libnspr.
>
> If they come from one source package, then they all build together. If
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:32:07PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I don't follow you. iceweasel, for example, is not independent from, say,
> libnspr.
If they come from one source package, then they all build together. If
they do not, then it's a dynamicly linked library and each can be built
Le May 13, 2008 09:54:46 pm Lennart Sorensen, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:27:31PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Packaging icebear wouldn't necessarily be useless. I defined it as yet
> > another IRC client for the sake of the example. You can imagine it as yet
> > another me
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:27:31PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Packaging icebear wouldn't necessarily be useless. I defined it as yet
> another
> IRC client for the sake of the example. You can imagine it as yet another
> media player if you think that's more useful.
You can't compare pack
Le May 13, 2008 09:39:38 am Lennart Sorensen, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:42:31PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > No, a more frequent change is disabling/enabling modules [on some arch].
> > Even if you were right, adding new module packages doesn't "justify"
> > updating othe
9 matches
Mail list logo
