Hello,
im have debianized www.ltsp.org.
the root-filesystem will now point to /usr/share/ltsp/arch and mounted
read-only by the clients
Now i need to have a swapfile folder where all the NFS_Swap files for
the clints can be. Please tell me wich directory would be fine.
I thinking about
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Daniel Josua Priem wrote:
Hello,
im have debianized www.ltsp.org.
Have you looked at
http://termserv.berlios.de/debian/dists/stable/non-free/binary-i386/
?
the root-filesystem will now point to /usr/share/ltsp/arch and mounted
read-only by the clients
/usr/share
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
| the root-filesystem will now point to /usr/share/ltsp/arch and mounted
| read-only by the clients
|
| /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the
| clients can be regenerated, that should go into
|
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Cameron Patrick wrote:
| /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the
| clients can be regenerated, that should go into
| /var/lib/ltsp/arch.
No, in LTSP the one root filesystem image is static data shared between
all clients of a given
Am Son, 2003-09-28 um 10.55 schrieb Robert Jordens:
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Cameron Patrick wrote:
| /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the
| clients can be regenerated, that should go into
| /var/lib/ltsp/arch.
No, in LTSP the one root filesystem
So as total summary:
rootfs will be /usr/share/ltsp/archwhere arch means CLIENT arch
rootswap will be /var/cache/ltspbecause refering to FHS /var/cache
: Application _cache_ dataset different disk and backup policies..
If anybody willing to tell other directorys.
Tell but
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:55:56AM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Cameron Patrick wrote:
| /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the
| clients can be regenerated, that should go into
| /var/lib/ltsp/arch.
No, in LTSP the one root
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Steve Langasek wrote:
But this is strange. Why does lts-core include it's own version of
busybox and X and other packages? Why not use the Debian packages and
unpack them into the lts-root? What about security fixes as the recent
one in xfree86? Those don't get
Am Son, 2003-09-28 um 17.24 schrieb Robert Jordens:
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Steve Langasek wrote:
But this is strange. Why does lts-core include it's own version of
busybox and X and other packages? Why not use the Debian packages and
unpack them into the lts-root? What about
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Daniel J. Priem wrote:
build_rootfs.sh clientarch=i386/mips/ppc xservers=all/svga/vga16
from=f.d.o saveconf=/etc/ltsp/rootfs.conf
on secupdates we update ltsp-core
This seems unnecessary and won't work as desired. If ltsp is in stable
you cannot ask for a
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
This seems unnecessary and won't work as desired. If ltsp is in stable
you cannot ask for a security update of ltsp-core everytime a security
advisory for busybox or xfree86 happens.
Why not? I mean I do agree that it is not the
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
This seems unnecessary and won't work as desired. If ltsp is in stable
you cannot ask for a security update of ltsp-core everytime a security
advisory for busybox or xfree86
12 matches
Mail list logo
