in the repo has the
native bits commented out so is effectively a separate (but rather
similar) source package:
http://people.debian.org/~wookey/bootstrap/ubunturepo/pool/main/c/cross-build-essential/
(the testing has been done in Ubuntu as the toolchains are already
in-archive, so it would need a few
such combinations with
cross-build-essential?
Multiarch should support this and dpkg-architecture already does. So
if someone wants to maintain toolchains to do this then adding an
entry to cross-build-essential is easy. (We didn't put everything
possible supported by dpkg in, because
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
On 28/06/12 10:17, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Say I want to have the build-essential for i386 installed on amd64.
I could install build-essential:i386, replacing gcc/g++:amd64 with
gcc/g++:i386. Wouldn't that give me everything needed to cross-compile
for a
crossbuild-essential-arch packages.
http://odin1.pehjota.net/~pj/debian-bootstrap/build-essential/
The initial patches there add crossbuild-essential packages to the
build-essential source, which is easy to do but leads to some questions.
1) Some of the packages that cross-build-essential
On 28/06/12 10:17, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Say I want to have the build-essential for i386 installed on amd64.
I could install build-essential:i386, replacing gcc/g++:amd64 with
gcc/g++:i386. Wouldn't that give me everything needed to cross-compile
for i386?
For evolutions of the same CPU
) kFreeBSD:amd64 or
Hurd:i386. Any plans to support such combinations with
cross-build-essential?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1340876597.32095.129.ca
On 28/06/12 10:43, Svante Signell wrote:
The situation is even more complicated if compiling for different OSes:
Like as host (build) Linux:i386 and guest (target) kFreeBSD:amd64 or
Hurd:i386. Any plans to support such combinations with
cross-build-essential?
It shouldn't differ from
+++ Svante Signell [2012-06-28 11:43 +0200]:
The situation is even more complicated if compiling for different OSes:
Like as host (build) Linux:i386 and guest (target) kFreeBSD:amd64 or
Hurd:i386. Any plans to support such combinations with
cross-build-essential?
Multiarch should support
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:29:20AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 28/06/12 10:17, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Say I want to have the build-essential for i386 installed on amd64.
I could install build-essential:i386, replacing gcc/g++:amd64 with
gcc/g++:i386. Wouldn't that give me
such combinations with
cross-build-essential?
It shouldn't differ from compiling for different CPUs: the key problem
in cross-compilation is your build system can't run your host system's
binaries, which you can arrive at either via differing OSs or differing
CPUs. (Or both, of course.)
It's not just
://odin1.pehjota.net/~pj/debian-bootstrap/build-essential/
The initial patches there add crossbuild-essential packages to the
build-essential source, which is easy to do but leads to some questions.
1) Some of the packages that cross-build-essential depends on (cross-compiler
packages) are not yet
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:04:26 +0100
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
A bit of background here for those who aren't following all the details:
We are working towards having cross-compilers in the archive. The plan
is for those toolchains to use multiarch so that the existing
libc:arch
Hi all,
I have not so time available too, but :
- I need a good cross toolchain solution for armel/armhf.
- I use debian on my sheevas and desktops
- I have allready made a port of DoudouLinux Debian based system on
Genesi SmartBook
- I have a lot of others projects still in progress or in
+++ Paul Wise [2012-01-21 20:37 +0800]:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
Currently on Debian you'll need to have made the emdebian repositories
available because otherwise you won't find any cross-compilers, but
hopefully we'll have them in the main archive in the not-too
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
Currently on Debian you'll need to have made the emdebian repositories
available because otherwise you won't find any cross-compilers, but
hopefully we'll have them in the main archive in the not-too distant.
Whats the status/blockers for getting
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:37:58 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
Currently on Debian you'll need to have made the emdebian repositories
available because otherwise you won't find any cross-compilers, but
hopefully we'll have them in the
Le 21/01/2012 16:29, Neil Williams a écrit :
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:37:58 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
Currently on Debian you'll need to have made the emdebian repositories
available because otherwise you won't find any
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:03:11 +0100
Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr wrote:
Le 21/01/2012 16:29, Neil Williams a écrit :
The cross-dependency resolution is yet another feature of Debian which
is waiting for MultiArch...
While waiting on proper MultiArch in Debian (when will dpkg with
I've thought for a long time that a package like build-essential for
cross-building would be a really good idea.
Currently to get the right tools and libs installed for cross-building
you need to do slightly different things on different distros
Having just been looking at sbuild cross-support
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:10:28PM +, Wookey wrote:
Having just been looking at sbuild cross-support it becomes clear that
something like this would be a very useful adititon.
Can anyone see any reason why we shouldn't just have
$arch-crossbuild-essential which depends on the right
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:10:28 +
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
I've thought for a long time that a package like build-essential for
cross-building would be a really good idea.
+1
Currently to get the right tools and libs installed for cross-building
you need to do slightly different
+++ Neil Williams [2012-01-19 13:02 +]:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:10:28 +
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
I've thought for a long time that a package like build-essential for
cross-building would be a really good idea.
+1
It should probably depend on build-essential itself as
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:10:28 +
Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
I've thought for a long time that a package like build-essential for
cross-building would be a really good idea.
Currently to get the right tools and libs installed for cross-building
you need to do slightly different
23 matches
Mail list logo
