Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-05 Thread Niels Thykier
Simon McVittie: > On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 at 19:43:13 +, Niels Thykier wrote: >> I do not mind managing a mass-bug filing for removing manual dbg >> packages without reverse dependencies if that is any help. > > Is there a plan/timeline for having -dbgsym packages appear in testing > (and ideally

Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-05 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 at 19:43:13 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > I do not mind managing a mass-bug filing for removing manual dbg > packages without reverse dependencies if that is any help. Is there a plan/timeline for having -dbgsym packages appear in testing (and ideally also stable backports),

Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-05 Thread Niels Thykier
Matthias Klose: > On 03.04.2016 12:12, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> With the latest debhelper upload today, I believe compat 10 is now ready >> for widespread testing. > > please could you consider generating new style dbg files (using > build-id) for every debhelper compat level, if a

Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-05 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:01:40PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 05.04.2016 00:23, Steve Langasek wrote: > >That's a behavior change for existing packages and may introduce build > >failures for packages that assume things about the output of dh_strip. It's > >inconsistent with the design

Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-05 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05.04.2016 00:23, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:28:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 03.04.2016 12:12, Niels Thykier wrote: With the latest debhelper upload today, I believe compat 10 is now ready for widespread testing. please could you consider generating new

Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:28:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 03.04.2016 12:12, Niels Thykier wrote: > >With the latest debhelper upload today, I believe compat 10 is now ready > >for widespread testing. > please could you consider generating new style dbg files (using build-id) > for

Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 03.04.2016 12:12, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi, With the latest debhelper upload today, I believe compat 10 is now ready for widespread testing. please could you consider generating new style dbg files (using build-id) for every debhelper compat level, if a binary file has a build-id? The

Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-04 Thread Niels Thykier
Andreas Tille: > Hi Niels, > > thanks a lot for working on debhelper! > You are welcome :) > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 10:12:46AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >> A couple of notes: >> >> * On autoreconf vs config.{sub,guess}: The default sequence now >>always updates config.{sub,guess} even

Re: debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Niels, thanks a lot for working on debhelper! On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 10:12:46AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > A couple of notes: > > * On autoreconf vs config.{sub,guess}: The default sequence now >always updates config.{sub,guess} even if autoreconf would not. >- There is a

debhelper compat 10 ready for testing (debhelper/9.20160403)

2016-04-03 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, With the latest debhelper upload today, I believe compat 10 is now ready for widespread testing. The following is the list of changes: > v10 This compatibility level is open for beta testing; changes may > occur. > > Changes from v9 are: > > -