Re: debhelper design change - RFC (long)

1998-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Richard Braakman wrote: > It should be possible to construct a regexp that detects these usage > patterns. Then you could grep through the .diff.gz files on the > archive to see if they are used anywhere, and file individual > bugreports. With a few exceptions, the diffs are not very large -- > y

Re: debhelper design change - RFC (long)

1998-01-03 Thread Richard Braakman
It should be possible to construct a regexp that detects these usage patterns. Then you could grep through the .diff.gz files on the archive to see if they are used anywhere, and file individual bugreports. With a few exceptions, the diffs are not very large -- you won't be grepping through 500 M

Re: debhelper design change - RFC (long)

1998-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Ben Gertzfield wrote: > Okay. Is there any way we can possibly detect and issue a warning if > someone tries the old behavior (when would this happen) if we go with > #3, also? I thought about that. I can test to see if parameters are specified and the package being acted on is not the first binar

Re: debhelper design change - RFC (long)

1998-01-03 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joey> Ben Gertzfield wrote: Ben> I agree, and would prefer #3 -- but is there anything but Ben> dh_installdirs that needs to be changed if we do it that way? Joey> Yes. This change would effect at least: Joey> dh_installd

Re: debhelper design change - RFC (long)

1998-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Ben Gertzfield wrote: > I agree, and would prefer #3 -- but is there anything but > dh_installdirs that needs to be changed if we do it that way? Yes. This change would effect at least: dh_installdirs, dh_installdocs, dh_installchangelogs, dh_installexamples, dh_undocumented, dh_installmanpages,

Re: debhelper design change - RFC (long)

1998-01-03 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: *excellent explanation of what can happen snipped* Joey> I far prefer #3, I feel it's the cleanest way to go (it will Joey> simplify the man pages a lot), but its backwards Joey> compatability problems worry me. If people think #3

debhelper design change - RFC (long)

1998-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
Ben Gertzfield has convinced me that debhelper's special treatment of the first package listed in debian/control isn't a good thing. I'm thinking about redesigning debhelper to act in a more consitent fasion. Of course, backwards compatability is very important. (Especially since people enjoy cutti