Carlo Segre se...@iit.edu writes:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
We are currently reworking the non-free support in the buildd
network. In the long term, we want to be able to build whitelisted
packages, and allow contrib packages to use binaries built from
whitelisted
Carlo Segre se...@iit.edu writes:
An alternative which would remove the inconsistency is to make the
decision that contrib packages will not be built by the officeial
buildd network but have to be built as non-free packages are, on the
unofficial buildd network.
If my understanding is
Hi Marc:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Carlo Segre se...@iit.edu writes:
An alternative which would remove the inconsistency is to make the
decision that contrib packages will not be built by the officeial
buildd network but have to be built as non-free packages are, on
Hello All:
The definition of the contrib section of the archive reads [0]
Examples of packages which would be included in contrib are:
* free packages which require contrib, non-free packages or packages
which are not in our archive at all for compilation or execution,
There
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:37:25PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
Hello All:
The definition of the contrib section of the archive reads [0]
Examples of packages which would be included in contrib are:
* free packages which require contrib, non-free packages or packages
which
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:37:25PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
* free packages which require contrib, non-free packages or packages
which are not in our archive at all for compilation or execution,
There is apparently an ambiguity here
6 matches
Mail list logo
