Dale Scheetz writes (Re: dpkg-buildpackage and -source questions):
On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
If you get this message [deleted]
you should upgrade your cpio. [...]
This resolved the problem for me. At least at this point I can unpack
hello ok. Shouldn't dpkg have a depends
If you get this message:
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./exmh_1.6.9.orig.tar.gz' contains object with
newline in its name
(exmh-1.6.9.orig/?exmh-1.6.9.orig/exmh.README?exmh-1.6.9.orig/COPYRIGHT?exmh-1.6.9.orig/e...(rest
of output deleted)
You should upgrade your cpio. Unfortunately the
On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
If you get this message:
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./exmh_1.6.9.orig.tar.gz' contains object with
newline in its name
(exmh-1.6.9.orig/?exmh-1.6.9.orig/exmh.README?exmh-1.6.9.orig/COPYRIGHT?exmh-1.6.9.orig/e...(rest
of output deleted)
You
Karl Sackett writes (dpkg-buildpackage and -source questions):
Regarding the -r option for dpkg-buildpackage, are there any
examples of what's called for here? Is the gain-root-command
something each developer provides for himself, or is there a command
or shell somewhere that performs
Regarding the -r option for dpkg-buildpackage, are there any examples of what's
called for here? Is the gain-root-command something each developer provides
for himself, or is there a command or shell somewhere that performs this
function?
Invoked as root, dpkg-buildpackage works fine. But when
5 matches
Mail list logo
