On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:35:44AM -0500, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
hi,
> I am having a problem, and I guess I might not be the only one who
> might stumble into it. When one wants to do something in new installs
> of the package, they usually check for $2 != "" in the postinst and pu
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:35:44AM -0500, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Is my analysis flawed? Is there a way to differentiate between a
> reconfigure and a reinstall that I didn't see? Is there a cleaner
> approach to this problem than dynamically generating the postinst?
take a look at $1 as passed
Hi!
I am having a problem, and I guess I might not be the only one who
might stumble into it. When one wants to do something in new installs
of the package, they usually check for $2 != "" in the postinst and put
the stuff in there. So far, so good, and policy friendly because you
might
3 matches
Mail list logo
