Re: elm problems

1996-08-09 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 8 Aug 1996, Kai Henningsen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg) wrote on 05.08.96 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You (Dale Scheetz) wrote: No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same

Re: elm problems

1996-08-05 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
You (Dale Scheetz) wrote: No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same make. The line in the Makefile is: cd lib; $(MAKE) $(MJ) -(MAKEFLAGS) all ^ Could it be

Re: elm problems

1996-08-05 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Mon, 5 Aug 1996, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: You (Dale Scheetz) wrote: No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same make. The line in the Makefile is: cd lib; $(MAKE) $(MJ)

Re: elm problems

1996-08-04 Thread Guy Maor
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake -w all cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake - all ^ (no w) Was that a typo on your part? Guy

Re: elm problems

1996-08-04 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Guy Maor wrote: On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake -w all cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake - all ^ (no w) Was that a typo on your part? No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed when

elm problems

1996-08-02 Thread Dale Scheetz
I just tried to build elm from the debian source package with the thought that I might be able to maintain it. So far the verdict is not in. The build target in debian.rules is really very simple: make make documentation touch build However, if I try debian.rules build I