On 8 Aug 1996, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg) wrote on 05.08.96 in [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:
You (Dale Scheetz) wrote:
No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed
when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same
You (Dale Scheetz) wrote:
No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed
when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same make.
The line in the Makefile is:
cd lib; $(MAKE) $(MJ) -(MAKEFLAGS) all
^
Could it be
On Mon, 5 Aug 1996, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
You (Dale Scheetz) wrote:
No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed
when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same make.
The line in the Makefile is:
cd lib; $(MAKE) $(MJ)
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake -w all
cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake - all
^ (no w)
Was that a typo on your part?
Guy
On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake -w all
cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake - all
^ (no w)
Was that a typo on your part?
No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed
when
I just tried to build elm from the debian source package with the thought
that I might be able to maintain it. So far the verdict is not in.
The build target in debian.rules is really very simple:
make
make documentation
touch build
However, if I try debian.rules build I
6 matches
Mail list logo