[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Takao KAWAMURA) writes:
> > Can we remove emacs19 from unstable now? It's de facto orphaned both
> > upstream and in Debian, and a new version exists, supported in both
> > upstream and Debian.
> Yes we can. We should do so, I think.
If so, please be sure to get rid of custom a
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 03:52:16PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 08:19:29PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > BTW I was told removing all non-current Netscape Navigator versions
> > > will be done RSN (if it wasn't already done, haven't checked today).
> >
> > that could be a
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 08:19:29PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > BTW I was told removing all non-current Netscape Navigator versions
> > will be done RSN (if it wasn't already done, haven't checked today).
>
> that could be a problem on the powerpc branch as the only available
> netscape is an ou
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 08:11:11PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> BTW I was told removing all non-current Netscape Navigator versions
> will be done RSN (if it wasn't already done, haven't checked today).
that could be a problem on the powerpc branch as the only available
netscape is an outdated
> Can we remove emacs19 from unstable now? It's de facto orphaned both
> upstream and in Debian, and a new version exists, supported in both
> upstream and Debian.
Yes we can. We should do so, I think.
Not only emacs19 but also mule2 should be removed. Because
mule2 is multilingualized emacs19,
- Forwarded message from Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#57636: Security problem with emacs19
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 57636
X-Debian-PR-Package: emacs19
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
Date:
6 matches
Mail list logo
