Re: epoch bump request for protracker

2019-12-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 09:41:57AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Upstream renaming is a very rare (and AFAIK *only*) chance for you to > actually get rid of epochs cleanly! I'd very much suggest you take this > chance! > > Basically what you do is rename everything and use the new version >

Re: epoch bump request for protracker

2019-12-23 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Gürkan Myczko, On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 06:32:15AM +0100, Gürkan Myczko wrote: > Emailing only debian-devel, replies with cc to me please. > > protracker [1], version 2.b37-1 now release a non-beta version called 1.01. > Instead of permanently using 2.b37+really1.01, I'd go for > 1:1.01,

epoch bump request for protracker

2019-12-22 Thread Gürkan Myczko
Emailing only debian-devel, replies with cc to me please. protracker [1], version 2.b37-1 now release a non-beta version called 1.01. Instead of permanently using 2.b37+really1.01, I'd go for 1:1.01, and renaming protracker to pt2-clone [2] (as upstream calls it) (the source+bin pkg rename