Re: etch release target: SELinux?? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-04-12 Thread paddy
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:07:13AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > If a tee-shirt with 'I > fixed the oldest bug in Debian, and all I got was this lousey tee-shirt' > helps to motivate folks -- great by me! And great for our users and > Debian! And then, as if by magic On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:

Re: etch release target: SELinux?? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-04-12 Thread Kevin Mark
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:24:48AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Kevin Mark wrote: > > > Given the fact that the current standard installation installs both gcc, > > > gdb and other development packages weighting more than that (see #301138, > > > which nobody wants to fix) > > Sorry to interupt, ju

Re: etch release target: SELinux?? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-04-12 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, April 11, 2005 21:46, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña said: > Given the fact that the current standard installation installs both gcc, > gdb and other development packages weighting more than that (see #301138, > which nobody wants to fix) I don't find that an issue. After reading that bug

Re: etch release target: SELinux?? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-04-12 Thread Joey Hess
Kevin Mark wrote: > > Given the fact that the current standard installation installs both gcc, > > gdb and other development packages weighting more than that (see #301138, > > which nobody wants to fix) > Sorry to interupt, just got a stupid idea, if as Javier suggests, there > are bugs that no

Re: etch release target: SELinux?? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-04-11 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:46:37PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:50:23PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > > > For people who don't use SE Linux the support in those programs will only > > take > > a few K of disk space and will not give a performance ov

Re: etch release target: SELinux?? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-04-11 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:50:23PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > For people who don't use SE Linux the support in those programs will only > take > a few K of disk space and will not give a performance overhead. Given the fact that the current standard installation installs both gcc, gdb and

Re: etch release target: SELinux?? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-04-11 Thread Russell Coker
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 22:14, David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just that it is not lost: SELinux soft support (patched utilities available > in main). There seems to be a repository that mostly works (I'm not in the > loop about currentness though) and it'd is probably an important s

etch release target: SELinux?? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-16 Thread David Schmitt
On Monday 14 March 2005 05:45, Steve Langasek wrote: > Further plans for etch > -- [...] > Meanwhile, much of the release team's energy will be focused on > coordinating the many major changes that are sure to hit the archive > shortly after sarge's release. We already know o