Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/22/05, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Olaf van der Spek]
I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
(more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
load on central servers?
Please
On 7/4/05, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure how exactly the current mirrors work, but syncing
(primary) mirrors between eachother instead of all from a master may
be an idea.
Mirrors are stacked in a tree (and even
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
True. But for example, is the current apt-get capable of contacting
another mirror if and only if the primary fails?
For package downloads apt will try the sources in the order listed in
sources.list, only trying subsequent
On 7/4/05, Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
True. But for example, is the current apt-get capable of contacting
another mirror if and only if the primary fails?
For package downloads apt will try the sources in the
On 10332 March 1977, sean finney wrote:
I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but...
why wasn't this brought up *before* it was brought to an end?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:05:25PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
It was sent right after the hosting died.
Should he sent The hosting may die somewhere in the future, please
offer something just in case we need it?
well, i guess i don't know the details of the situation, but i would
hope that
On 6/26/05, Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10332 March 1977, sean finney wrote:
I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but...
why
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:14:44PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:05:25PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
It was sent right after the hosting died.
Should he sent The hosting may die somewhere in the future, please
offer something just in case we need it?
well, i guess
hi,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:25:12AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but...
why wasn't this brought up *before* it
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:22:29PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:25:12AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
sorry to be a stick in the mud
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 20.02, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
[debian infrastructure]
I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
(more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
load on central servers?
You said it yourself: in the long term.
I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
Debian machines for over 6 years now in what's been one of the best
and hassle-free donated hostings we've
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you think you could offer hosting under these conditions, please
send details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
already been considered and rejected). We could perhaps take
advantage of the
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for critical parts of
infrastructure like ftpmaster be
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for
On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
and
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I think the point is that we ask for a donation before we spend money
on it.
Sure, but the statement quoted above rules it out entirely. can't pay is
pretty definitive. I'm wondering why
On 22/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for critical
[Jonas Meurer]
paying for any parts of infrastructure would delete the independance
from donations. debian was never depending on any donations, for
good reasons. if we change this, the next step will be that some
monstrous companies offer deals to us: We give you money, you give
us XYZ
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:43:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
I was
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
already been considered and rejected). We could perhaps take
advantage of the California Community Colocation Project, which offers
free colocation for non-profits and individuals.
Unfortunatly
On 6/22/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you think you could offer hosting under these conditions, please
send details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
already been
[Olaf van der Spek]
I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
(more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
load on central servers?
Please give some specific examples of what you mean.
Debian services are already distributed across a wide
On 6/22/05, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Olaf van der Spek]
I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
(more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
load on central servers?
Please give some specific examples of what you mean.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunatly the CCCP is currently maxed out on power in its existing
racks, so is not taking new clients, unless one moves.
Is this true for its sister sites too? The web page says they have
sites in Seattle, Chicago, Toronto, and Washington.
Thomas
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Frost wrote:
:: Based on the requirements it seems unlikely Debian
:: would be able to afford to pay for hosting very
:: long with our current donation income amounts.
:: Gigabit network connections and associated rack space
:: is cheaper than
26 matches
Mail list logo
