Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-15 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:12:41 -0500, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > Does anyone have thoughts on a Debian-wide migration towards GCC 3.2? > (Or, for that matter, towards *anything* in the 3.x line). The upcoming ABI change from 3.1 to 3.2 is the reason we've not switched to 3.1 as the Debian-wi

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-15 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We should count ourselves lucky that we don't have stable releases using > each of the GCC 2.9x, 3.0, and 3.1 ABIs. Does anyone have thoughts on a Debian-wide migration towards GCC 3.2? (Or, for that matter, towards *anything* in the 3.x line).

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Wed, Aug 14, 2002, à 10:15:17AM -0400, Michael Stone a écrit: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > > "The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > "The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively stable and > > common C++ ABI for GNU/Linux and BSD usage. Un

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel w

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread mdew
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 02:00, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > >

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2.

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2. > Again? *sigh* "The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively stable and common C++ ABI f

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-14 Thread Joseph Carter
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2. The > "old" libraries compiled with g++ 3.0.x or 3.1.x can't be used > with 3.2 anymore. Again? *sigh* Apparently their C++ ABI stability goes about as far as my vision.

Re: g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-13 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Nikita, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: Hello. I wanted to install g++ 3.2 (instead of 3.1 that is buggy) on our server running woody with several packages from unstable. I noticed that g++ 3.2 depends on recent libc6. Is it safe to install libc6 from unstable now? Are libdb problems resolved?

g++ 3.2 on woody ?

2002-08-12 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. I wanted to install g++ 3.2 (instead of 3.1 that is buggy) on our server running woody with several packages from unstable. I noticed that g++ 3.2 depends on recent libc6. Is it safe to install libc6 from unstable now? Are libdb problems resolved?