Re: gcc-4.1 [gfdl] documentation packages for non-free

2006-09-17 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:06:02AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: I've created gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg package, intended for non-free. This package builds several binary packages (cpp-4.1-doc, gcc-4.1-doc, gfortran-4.1-doc, tree;ang-4.1-doc), that contain all files - man pages, info

Re: gcc-4.1 [gfdl] documentation packages for non-free

2006-09-17 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:02:16AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: Why is this a native Debian package? I know that the tarball it is based on is not one distributed as such by upstream, but it is based on files from an upstream source. The way you do it now, you can't see what you

gcc-4.1 [gfdl] documentation packages for non-free

2006-09-16 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc documentation. Both myself and people to whom I recommend Debian, *need* gcc documentation to be available in the system. So I had four options: - start a new flamewar on the issue, - stop to use Debian (and to recomment it), -

Re: gcc-4.1 [gfdl] documentation packages for non-free

2006-09-16 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:06:02AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: I've created gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg package, intended for non-free. This package builds several binary packages (cpp-4.1-doc, gcc-4.1-doc, gfortran-4.1-doc, tree;ang-4.1-doc), that contain all files - man pages, info and

Re: gcc-4.1 [gfdl] documentation packages for non-free

2006-09-16 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: Hello. I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc documentation. Both myself and people to whom I recommend Debian, *need* gcc documentation to be available in the system. So I had four options: - start a new flamewar on the issue, - stop to

Re: gcc-4.1 [gfdl] documentation packages for non-free

2006-09-16 Thread Ben Finney
Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc documentation. Both myself and people to whom I recommend Debian, *need* gcc documentation to be available in the system. The FSF agree with your position.