On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:06:02AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I've created gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg package, intended for non-free. This
package builds several binary packages (cpp-4.1-doc, gcc-4.1-doc,
gfortran-4.1-doc, tree;ang-4.1-doc), that contain all files - man
pages, info
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:02:16AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Why is this a native Debian package? I know that the tarball it is based
on is not one distributed as such by upstream, but it is based on files
from an upstream source. The way you do it now, you can't see what you
Hello.
I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc documentation. Both
myself and people to whom I recommend Debian, *need* gcc documentation to
be available in the system.
So I had four options:
- start a new flamewar on the issue,
- stop to use Debian (and to recomment it),
-
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:06:02AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I've created gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg package, intended for non-free. This
package builds several binary packages (cpp-4.1-doc, gcc-4.1-doc,
gfortran-4.1-doc, tree;ang-4.1-doc), that contain all files - man pages,
info and
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Hello.
I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc documentation. Both
myself and people to whom I recommend Debian, *need* gcc documentation to
be available in the system.
So I had four options:
- start a new flamewar on the issue,
- stop to
Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc
documentation. Both myself and people to whom I recommend Debian,
*need* gcc documentation to be available in the system.
The FSF agree with your position.
6 matches
Mail list logo