Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Randolph Chung
> BTW, why this problem manifest itself only on hppa? Is the c++ compiler > somewhat different or is only a chain of #ifdef and/or configure > switches that behaves differently on that arch? In woody, hppa is the only architecture that is using gcc-3.0 compilers. The other architectures are all us

Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:45:39AM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > it needs some c++ work. For one thing it references internal libstdc++ > symbols (__STL_BEGIN_NAMESPACE, etc). Instead you should use "namespace std;", > etc. In fact I noticed the problem and I already forwarder it to the upstream

Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Stefano Zacchiroli, dated Apr 07: > I noticed that another package of mine, which is needed to build > gtkmathview, wasn't successfully rebuilt on hppa, namely package > "gmetadom". it needs some c++ work. For one thing it references internal libstdc++ symbols (__STL

Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:24:40AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I'm wondering why the hell "gmetadom" isn't mention as out of data on > hppa in update_excuses which reports only: It's only out of date if it was previously built for an architecture. AFAICT from madison it has never been buil

gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
I noticed that another package of mine, which is needed to build gtkmathview, wasn't successfully rebuilt on hppa, namely package "gmetadom". I'm wondering why the hell "gmetadom" isn't mention as out of data on hppa in update_excuses which reports only: * gmetadom (- to 0.0.3-5) +