Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Troy Benjegerdes
This might also be of interest to package/maintain/integrate: https://github.com/Drive-Trust-Alliance/sedutil I saw a comment about the --security arguments to hdparm being somewhat unreliable. On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:02:32PM +0100, Ivan Gimenez wrote: > Hi > > For me it is ok, I am just a

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >igimenez@debian:~/debian/hdparm$ gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new [...] running debsign failed yes, you have to sign them. By default the key is searched with a match on the debian/changelog last entry. You can override it by exporting export DEBEMAIL='youremail' export DEBFULLNAME='name

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:11:59AM +0100, Ivan Gimenez wrote: > Hi Alex > > Sorry if the question is dumb... > Just cloned and while trying to build the package I got snip > gpg: skipped "Alexandre Mestiashvili ": secret > key not available snip > Does your changes

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Ivan Gimenez
Excellent point Ginfranco That will help me for sure when I had all the changes on package ready to upload. I was trying to build it for testing purposes, so as my very much appreciated debian mentor told me, adding the options -us -uc would suffice. Regards Ivan On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:57

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Ivan Gimenez
Hi Alex Sorry if the question is dumb... Just cloned and while trying to build the package I got igimenez@debian:~/debian/hdparm$ gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new [...] Now signing changes and any dsc files... signfile hdparm_9.48-1.dsc Alexandre Mestiashvili < a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de> gpg:

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Ivan Gimenez
Alex Impressive upload. I have already checked out and I am starting to understand how the gpb packager works out. Thx for the links Regards Ivan On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > On 03/01/2016 06:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Hello, > > >

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 01.03.2016, 19:57 +0100 schrieb Alex Mestiashvili: > > On 03/01/2016 06:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > > > As there are at least 3

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Dienstag, den 01.03.2016, 19:57 +0100 schrieb Alex Mestiashvili: > On 03/01/2016 06:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > > As there are at least 3 persons ( including me :) ) interesting > > > in the > > > package, I think it will

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 03/01/2016 06:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: >> As there are at least 3 persons ( including me :) ) interesting in the >> package, I think it will be a good use case for a collab-maint repository. >> Further I suggest to use gbp [0] and

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > As there are at least 3 persons ( including me :) ) interesting in the > package, I think it will be a good use case for a collab-maint repository. > Further I suggest to use gbp [0] and also switch to debhelper. > > I've played a bit

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Jose-Luis Rivas
On 01/03/16, 05:02pm, Ivan Gimenez wrote: > Hi > > For me it is ok, I am just a newbie in packaging. > > I have received help from a debian mentor Anibal Montalve Salazar < > ani...@debian.org>, but I got no references for gbp > (yet another Debian packaging toolchain ? ) Yes:

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 03/01/2016 10:13 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello, > > hdparm is a popular package which has been recently orphaned (see > #816168). It provides an udeb so it might be needed/useful in the context > of debian-installer too. There are multiple reverse dependencies too. > > There are 4 RC

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Ivan Gimenez
Hi For me it is ok, I am just a newbie in packaging. I have received help from a debian mentor Anibal Montalve Salazar < ani...@debian.org>, but I got no references for gbp (yet another Debian packaging toolchain ? ) what is exactly a collab-maint repository, a Git repo for the package host

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Juerg Haefliger
> Hello, > > hdparm is a popular package which has been recently orphaned (see > #816168). It provides an udeb so it might be needed/useful in the context > of debian-installer too. There are multiple reverse dependencies too. > > There are 4 RC bugs against it and a new upstream release waiting

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Ivan Gimenez
Hi I would like to help. I am an experienced software developer (C/C++) but have no experience in packaging. I don't know if hdparm is hard to package for a newbie mantainer, so If someone can mentor me on that part I would gladly adopt the package. Regards Ivan On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:13

hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-01 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, hdparm is a popular package which has been recently orphaned (see #816168). It provides an udeb so it might be needed/useful in the context of debian-installer too. There are multiple reverse dependencies too. There are 4 RC bugs against it and a new upstream release waiting to be