Re: heimdal and testing

2008-04-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:08:06PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: Anyway, the first problem is that cyrus-imapd-2.2 is not built on all arches yet: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=cyrus-imapd-2.2 Sounds like problems with ghostscript... Yes, precisely that. Is anyone

Re: heimdal and testing

2008-04-29 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hello, Hello Brian. For these kind of questions, I don't mind if you main the -release list directly. Can somebody please interpret why Heimdal is blocked from testing for me: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=heimdal The version of heimdal in unstable bumps sonames, so

Re: heimdal and testing

2008-04-28 Thread Brian May
Filipus Klutiero wrote: One of the things you could do is wait one day, after which cyrus-imapd-2.2 would be old enough to transition. cyrus-imapd-2.2 needs to be updated, otherwise cyrus-common-2.2 would become uninstallable due to its dependency on libkrb5-22-heimdal in testing. Another

Re: heimdal and testing

2008-04-28 Thread Filipus Klutiero
to its dependency on libkrb5-22-heimdal in testing. Another day, and nothing happened. I can't help think it is more complicated then that. http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=cyrus-imapd-2.2 says cyrus-imapd is now 10 days old and is waiting for Heimdal. e.g. have a look

heimdal and testing

2008-04-27 Thread Brian May
Hello, Can somebody please interpret why Heimdal is blocked from testing for me: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=heimdal As far as I can tell, it won't get installed because that would break kolab-cyrus-imapd

Re: heimdal and testing

2008-04-27 Thread Filipus Klutiero
One of the things you could do is wait one day, after which cyrus-imapd-2.2 would be old enough to transition. cyrus-imapd-2.2 needs to be updated, otherwise cyrus-common-2.2 would become uninstallable due to its dependency on libkrb5-22-heimdal in testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL