Alex Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some of us have woody running on LVM1... well I have this with 2.4 Debian
kernel and LVM1. For LVM1 to work with a kernel that has devfs compiled in
(debian kernels for woody do) then /dev/ has to be a mounted devfs.
For people such as myself sarge as it
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:03:42PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
Devfs is regarded as obsolete in the kernel source.
The current initrd images produced by initrd-tools does the following for a
LVM system:
mount -nt devfs devfs /dev
vgchange -a y
umount /dev
This relies on a kernel with
Op ma, 17-01-2005 te 20:03 +1100, schreef Russell Coker:
Devfs is regarded as obsolete in the kernel source.
The current initrd images produced by initrd-tools does the following for a
LVM system:
mount -nt devfs devfs /dev
vgchange -a y
umount /dev
This relies on a kernel with devfs
In that case, we should probably drop debian-installer altogether, as it
uses DevFS throughout :-)
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt in 2.6.11-rc1:
What: devfs
When: July 2005
Files: fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h and assorted devfs
function calls throughout the
On Monday 17 January 2005 20:34, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so unless Debian wants to stay with stoneage kernels you're better of
starting to fix D-I. That beeing said D-I people have been told
repeatedly that basing an installer on devfs is a bad idea long time
ago, but let's
5 matches
Mail list logo
