Re: isdnutils getting into testing is a problem...

2001-09-17 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 12 Sep 2001, Martin Schulze wrote: > This doesn't look sane anyway: > > Depends: isdnutils(>=1:3.1pre1b-1), isdnlog-data, debconf, libc6 (>= 2.2.3-7) > > Recommends: isdnlog-data > > > (apart from the missing space

Re: isdnutils getting into testing is a problem...

2001-09-12 Thread Martin Schulze
Paul Slootman wrote: > There's a little problem with getting isdnutils into testing... > Finally, after more than a year after isdnutils was split up into more > logical parts, it's a valid candidate for installation, without anyone > filing an RC bug at the last moment. Now I'm wondering why it's

Re: isdnutils getting into testing is a problem...

2001-09-12 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 12 Sep 2001, Philip Blundell wrote: > >Anyway: The problem is that a couple of the packages generated from > >isdnutils source are applicable for all architectures, and most are only > >usable where certain (ISDN) hardware is supported by the linux kernel. > >isdnlog-data falls under the se

Re: isdnutils getting into testing is a problem...

2001-09-12 Thread Philip Blundell
>Anyway: The problem is that a couple of the packages generated from >isdnutils source are applicable for all architectures, and most are only >usable where certain (ISDN) hardware is supported by the linux kernel. >isdnlog-data falls under the second category, BUT it's data that's >architecture-in

isdnutils getting into testing is a problem...

2001-09-12 Thread Paul Slootman
There's a little problem with getting isdnutils into testing... Finally, after more than a year after isdnutils was split up into more logical parts, it's a valid candidate for installation, without anyone filing an RC bug at the last moment. Now I'm wondering why it's not going in anyway, and I di