> > For the record, kaffe is *NOT* as good as the blackdown JDK. I
> > have used both, and, as it is, kaffe crashes before my research system
> > loads, yet the blackdown jdk works flawlessly.
>
> So report the bug to the kaffe people, and then they'll fix it, and then
> kaffe will work f
"Seth M. Landsman" wrote:
>
> > Basically, we're in BLATANT violation of the license currently. It states
> > quite clearly that redistribution is prohibited. So, plain and simple,
> > we're shit out of luck. As someone else pointed out, Kaffe is just as
> > good, with better response. But either
> "jim" == jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jim> If this is the case,
It is & I'm awaiting Sun permission to distribure the jdk with a
licence that allows redistribution in some form.
--
Stephen (jdk maintainer)
---
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. - Bruce Schneier
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 07:48:28PM -0400, Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
>
> > What is wrong with distributing an installation package like is
> > done with netscape and realaudio?
>
> Hrm. You know, that didn't occur to me. As long as it contains NOTH
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> What is wrong with distributing an installation package like is
> done with netscape and realaudio?
Hrm. You know, that didn't occur to me. As long as it contains NOTHING of
JDK, that's good. :)
> For the record, kaffe is *NOT* as good
> Basically, we're in BLATANT violation of the license currently. It states
> quite clearly that redistribution is prohibited. So, plain and simple,
> we're shit out of luck. As someone else pointed out, Kaffe is just as
> good, with better response. But either way, we have to lose jdk or
> convinc
On Mon, 17 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> I am given to understand that someone has found a problem in the license of
> jdk, to the point that same person finds that debian cannot distribute
> the jdk at all. I was told that the problem found in the license has
> existed for a long time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am given to understand that someone has found a problem in the license of
> jdk, to the point that same person finds that debian cannot distribute the jdk
> at all. I was told that the problem found in the license has existed for a
> long time.
>
> If this i
Hi
I am given to understand that someone has found a problem in the license of
jdk, to the point that same person finds that debian cannot distribute the jdk
at all. I was told that the problem found in the license has existed for a
long time.
If this is the case,
WHY is a jdk that doesn't eve
9 matches
Mail list logo
