Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hate replying to myself, but here we go..
> kdelibs is LGPL. As someone mentioned it does use some code derived
> from gettext (libintl.cpp), which is GPL. However the code was taken
> from a version modified for glibc2 where is was redistributed as L
On Fri, 09 Oct 1998, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>
>Now that all of KDE has gone, we are left with one issue: kdelibs.
>From what I heard kdelibs is LGPL'd and can be distributed freely.
>This would mean that someone could reupload it and it will be
>accepted into contrib?
I think that the packages q
I hate replying to myself, but here we go..
kdelibs is LGPL. As someone mentioned it does use some code derived
from gettext (libintl.cpp), which is GPL. However the code was taken
from a version modified for glibc2 where is was redistributed as LGPL.
I'll put the exact copyright message below.
F
Now that all of KDE has gone, we are left with one issue: kdelibs.
From what I heard kdelibs is LGPL'd and can be distributed freely.
This would mean that someone could reupload it and it will be
accepted into contrib?
Wichert.
--
4 matches
Mail list logo