Re: kdelibs and contrib

1998-10-09 Thread Raul Miller
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hate replying to myself, but here we go.. > kdelibs is LGPL. As someone mentioned it does use some code derived > from gettext (libintl.cpp), which is GPL. However the code was taken > from a version modified for glibc2 where is was redistributed as L

Re: kdelibs and contrib

1998-10-09 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 09 Oct 1998, Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> >Now that all of KDE has gone, we are left with one issue: kdelibs. >From what I heard kdelibs is LGPL'd and can be distributed freely. >This would mean that someone could reupload it and it will be >accepted into contrib? I think that the packages q

Re: kdelibs and contrib

1998-10-08 Thread Wichert Akkerman
I hate replying to myself, but here we go.. kdelibs is LGPL. As someone mentioned it does use some code derived from gettext (libintl.cpp), which is GPL. However the code was taken from a version modified for glibc2 where is was redistributed as LGPL. I'll put the exact copyright message below. F

kdelibs and contrib

1998-10-08 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Now that all of KDE has gone, we are left with one issue: kdelibs. From what I heard kdelibs is LGPL'd and can be distributed freely. This would mean that someone could reupload it and it will be accepted into contrib? Wichert. --