#include hallo.h
* martin f krafft [Mon, Sep 22 2003, 08:03:18PM]:
This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel
independent, so why does the kernel-source install Linux?
I think we should rename to linux-kernel-source, linux-kernel-image
and so on...
Good point. The idea is
also sprach Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.22.1213 +0200]:
So your complain reduces in my eyes to an incomplete label.
I personally think not having the term linux in it more of an
issue than having -debian in it...
This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.22.1213 +0200]:
So your complain reduces in my eyes to an incomplete label.
I personally think not having the term linux in it more of an
issue than having -debian in
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel
independent, so why does the kernel-source install Linux?
I think we should rename to linux-kernel-source, linux-kernel-image
and so on...
I very much agree
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:56:09PM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel
independent, so why does the kernel-source install Linux?
I think we should rename to
5 matches
Mail list logo