Re: kernel-source == Linux or Hurd or ???

2003-09-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * martin f krafft [Mon, Sep 22 2003, 08:03:18PM]: This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel independent, so why does the kernel-source install Linux? I think we should rename to linux-kernel-source, linux-kernel-image and so on... Good point. The idea is

kernel-source == Linux or Hurd or ???

2003-09-24 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.22.1213 +0200]: So your complain reduces in my eyes to an incomplete label. I personally think not having the term linux in it more of an issue than having -debian in it... This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel

Re: kernel-source == Linux or Hurd or ???

2003-09-24 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.09.22.1213 +0200]: So your complain reduces in my eyes to an incomplete label. I personally think not having the term linux in it more of an issue than having -debian in

Re: kernel-source == Linux or Hurd or ???

2003-09-24 Thread Ryan Underwood
Hi, On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel independent, so why does the kernel-source install Linux? I think we should rename to linux-kernel-source, linux-kernel-image and so on... I very much agree

Re: kernel-source == Linux or Hurd or ???

2003-09-24 Thread Joel Baker
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:56:09PM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote: Hi, On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: This is a good point. Debian makes an effort to be kernel independent, so why does the kernel-source install Linux? I think we should rename to