lack of libbz2 bindings [Was: Packages.bz2, ...]

2002-08-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:34:48PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: Presuming things continue to work in unstable, the same change will be made to testing in a few weeks. Similarly, the Contents-*.gz files for unstable will probably be switching to .bz2 in the not too distant future. The changes

Re: lack of libbz2 bindings [Was: Packages.bz2, ...]

2002-08-31 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:15:17AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: The changes uncomrpessed - .gz seems fine to me, but the changes .gz - .bz2 is IMO a bit risky. I'm thinking about the lack of binding for You misread the mail. .gz will continue to be available, .bz2 will be there as well

Re: lack of libbz2 bindings [Was: Packages.bz2, ...]

2002-08-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:24:51PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: You misread the mail. .gz will continue to be available, .bz2 will be there as well and the uncompressed files will be dropped. quote Similarly, the Contents-*.gz files for unstable will probably be switching to .bz2 in

Re: lack of libbz2 bindings [Was: Packages.bz2, ...]

2002-08-31 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Stefano Zacchiroli may or may not have written... On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:24:51PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: You misread the mail. .gz will continue to be available, .bz2 will be there as well and the uncompressed files will be dropped. quote Similarly, the