Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 21:42, Kevin Mark wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Ron Johnson a écrit : On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:42:08PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will see m68k in relase shape? That's exactly what we're planning to do. -- Lo-lan-do Home is

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: We plan to upload [glibc-2.5] right after the release of etch. This version works on all architectures, but m68k, hurd and hppa which don't have TLS support. For hppa the work is almost done, I am currently building the

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I haven't received any answer. That is untrue. I replied for the Hurd people.

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Thomas Schwinge a écrit : Hello! On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I haven't received any answer. That is untrue. I replied

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Barry deFreese
- Original Message - From: Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:45 AM Subject: Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: We plan to upload

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 26, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe hurd and m68k porters can maintain a glibc package using an old version (2.3.6 ??) together? Well that's for after Etch. What for? Modern threaded software will require TLS more and more. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description:

libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? Thanks - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is common sense really valid? For example, it is common sense to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:36:42AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]: Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in at this point of the release cycle. In fact, we don't even have 2.4 because there are a number of

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 11:48]: Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no. 2.5 came out a few days ago. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061025 11:37]: Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? No. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]: Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in at this

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Ron Johnson a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]: Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Ron Johnson a écrit : On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]: [snip] For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I haven't

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2006 11:21 AM, Ron Johnson wrote: On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Ron Johnson a écrit : On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]: [snip] For m68k and hurd, I have sent a

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Ron Johnson a écrit : On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]: [snip] For m68k

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Warren Turkal
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 20:42, Kevin Mark wrote: When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will see m68k in relase shape? AMD64 is a modern architecture. M68k is an architecture that saw its