-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 21:42, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ron Johnson a écrit :
On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:42:08PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an
unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will
see m68k in relase shape?
That's exactly what we're planning to do.
--
Lo-lan-do Home is
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
We plan to upload [glibc-2.5] right after the release of etch.
This version works on all architectures, but m68k, hurd and hppa which
don't have TLS support.
For hppa the work is almost done, I am currently building the
Hello!
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I
haven't received any answer.
That is untrue. I replied for the Hurd people.
Thomas Schwinge a écrit :
Hello!
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I
haven't received any answer.
That is untrue. I replied
- Original Message -
From: Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
We plan to upload
On Oct 26, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe hurd and m68k porters can maintain a glibc package using an old
version (2.3.6 ??) together? Well that's for after Etch.
What for? Modern threaded software will require TLS more and more.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
Thanks
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is common sense really valid?
For example, it is common sense to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:36:42AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]:
Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in
at this point of the release cycle. In fact, we don't even have 2.4
because there are a number of
* Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 11:48]:
Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no.
2.5 came out a few days ago.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061025 11:37]:
Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
No.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]:
Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in
at this
Ron Johnson a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]:
Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ron Johnson a écrit :
On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]:
[snip]
For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I
haven't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2006 11:21 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ron Johnson a écrit :
On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]:
[snip]
For m68k and hurd, I have sent a
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ron Johnson a écrit :
On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 04:36]:
[snip]
For m68k
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 20:42, Kevin Mark wrote:
When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an
unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will
see m68k in relase shape?
AMD64 is a modern architecture. M68k is an architecture that saw its
18 matches
Mail list logo