On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:43:06AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] sez:
Having 5 different versions of one library is just insane imho. What are
Maybe you could help out with the bugs here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=oldbdb;dist=unstable
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:44:56PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
It appears to me that essentially it is a problem moving from 4.2 to
4.6, but I see nothing about the intermediate versions. Having 2
releases is largely better than having 5 versions around, isn't it?
I was waiting for
Clint Adams schrieb:
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] sez:
Having 5 different versions of one library is just insane imho. What are
Maybe you could help out with the bugs here:
I don't know all the gory details so I don't feel capable to help with
this effort. Besides I already have quite
* Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071016 17:50]:
Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
following bdb versions installed:
version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
libdb4.2 40
libdb4.3 26
libdb4.4 55
libdb4.5 64
libdb4.6 40
Having
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:33:20PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
following bdb versions installed:
version: # of packages
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:37:21AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
If you want to help reducing this number, a good point would helping
getting more documentation about the different versions (and their
differences) available, and (at least for me) make some backports of the
suggested version
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
IMHO we should declare a quarantine of a minimum of 6 months on every new
libdb upstream, and only package it *if* openldap (*the* heavy-duty user of
libdb advanced features) and cyrus imap (*the* thousands-of-concurrent-
locks, mmap-happy user of
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:52:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
That's equivalent to an indefinite quarantine; according to BDB upstream,
OpenLDAP's problems with various versions are a consequence of abusing the
interface, not of using advanced features. I'm not sure why the burden
here
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] sez:
Having 5 different versions of one library is just insane imho. What are
Maybe you could help out with the bugs here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=oldbdb;dist=unstable
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:00:58 +0200
Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:52:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
That's equivalent to an indefinite quarantine; according to BDB
upstream, OpenLDAP's problems with various versions are a
consequence of
Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
following bdb versions installed:
version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
libdb4.2 40
libdb4.3 26
libdb4.4 55
libdb4.5 64
libdb4.6 40
Having 5 different versions of one library is just insane imho.
On 10/16/07, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
following bdb versions installed:
version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
libdb4.2 40
libdb4.3 26
libdb4.4 55
libdb4.5 64
libdb4.6 40
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:50:14 +0200
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
following bdb versions installed:
version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
libdb4.2 40
libdb4.3 26
libdb4.4 55
libdb4.5
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
following bdb versions installed:
version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
libdb4.2 40
libdb4.3 26
libdb4.4 55
libdb4.5 64
libdb4.6 40
Having 5
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
following bdb versions installed:
version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
libdb4.2 40
libdb4.3 26
libdb4.4 55
15 matches
Mail list logo