On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:11:07PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 07:40:26PM +0200 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> > > there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2.
> > >
> > > I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not
Hi Peter,
Am Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 07:40:26PM +0200 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> > there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2.
> >
> > I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not*
> > be maintained in the Debian Med team but rather some core team in
> >
Hi Peter,
Am Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 07:40:26PM +0200 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> > Please consider this mail a team-orphane of the package.
>
> I'm sorry; I do indeed intend to bring it into pkg-rpm, and I will try
> to do that in the next couple of days. Apologies for the months of
> delay, and than
On Monday, February 21, 2022 12:40:26 PM EST Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:40:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2.
> >
> > I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not*
> >
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:40:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2.
>
> I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not*
> be maintained in the Debian Med team but rather some core team in
> Debian. It i
Hi,
there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2.
I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not*
be maintained in the Debian Med team but rather some core team in
Debian. It is here for historic reasons but should have moved somewhere
more appropriatel
6 matches
Mail list logo
