[ Adding ftpmasters to To: ]
On 05/03/10 at 19:34 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I wonder what we (as Debian) could do about it. Would it make sense to
sponsor a very fast machine that the kernel team could use to build the
On 04/03/10 at 16:40 -0700, John Wright wrote:
Hi kernel team,
(Cc-ing -devel to get more eyes on the subject, since I'm soliciting
ideas here... See [1] for some context.)
What would it take to get kernel debuginfo into squeeze? As I
understand it, the main blockers were [2]:
Hi John,
Hi Lucas,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 04/03/10 at 16:40 -0700, John Wright wrote:
Hi kernel team,
(Cc-ing -devel to get more eyes on the subject, since I'm soliciting
ideas here... See [1] for some context.)
What would it take to get kernel
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I wonder what we (as Debian) could do about it. Would it make sense to
sponsor a very fast machine that the kernel team could use to build the
kernels and upload from, replacing kernel-archive.buildserver.net ?
The easiest fix is
Hi kernel team,
(Cc-ing -devel to get more eyes on the subject, since I'm soliciting
ideas here... See [1] for some context.)
What would it take to get kernel debuginfo into squeeze? As I
understand it, the main blockers were [2]:
1) It would blow up the archive by ~10 GB
- This is a
My 2 cents being that I'm far from part of the kernel team:
Am Freitag 05 März 2010 00:40:27 schrieb John Wright:
Hi kernel team,
What would it take to get kernel debuginfo into squeeze? As I
understand it, the main blockers were [2]:
1) It would blow up the archive by ~10 GB
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
