Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben:
>Well. I have reported "through the button" in the past months spam for three
>different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and
>debian-devel-spanish) and I *still* see the reported spam there [1]. So I'm a
>little bit skep
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:44:51AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
> The button is good for pointing out where we should remove something.
Well. I have reported "through the button" in the past months spam for three
different mailing lists (debian-doc, debian-l10n-spanish, and
debian-devel-spanish) a
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben:
>Well, I thought it would be useful to
>
>a) have spam mails from the mailing list archive
>b) enhance the filters
for that we have the 'report as spam'-Button. We also use that input
for the filters, but mainly, the damage is done in
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:33:04AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
> it's not ok to bounce us spam from years ago, this address is another
> feedback-loop to enhace our filters, it's useless to get old[1] spam
> there.
Well, I thought it would be useful to
a) have spam mails from the mailing list a
Hallo! Du (Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a) hast geschrieben:
>I've just bounced all the spam from Debian mailing lists that got through my
>(local and ISP's) filters and I had stored in a separate folder to that
>address. They are 33, hopefully it will not get me blacklisted.
>
>Is it OK if we, mu
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]:
>
> > Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this?
>
> Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'? ('b' does (B)ounce
> in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for...
Ou
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:47:41 +0100]:
> Is it OK if we, mutt users, use this?
Why not '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'? ('b' does (B)ounce
in the default keybindings). THat's what Cord asked for...
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:03:31AM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
>
> If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The advantage of posting it here is that it can be used as a measure of how
much spam does posting to a debian mailing attracts, spammers will probably
send some
Hallo! Du (Amaya) hast geschrieben:
>Cord Beermann wrote:
>> Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter,
>
>May I ask why?
You may. ;-)
I looked into this and found that we automagically train the bayes
with the spam we get, but we don't train in the ham.
Another thing for the ever
Hi Cord!
First of all, thanks for the listamster work involving spam.
Cord Beermann wrote:
> Also we (the listmasters) don't train the bayes-filter,
May I ask why?
> we add also rules to procmail and SpamAssassin if nessecary.
That's great, thanks.
--
.''`. I may not have gone where I in
Hallo! Du (Blars Blarson) hast geschrieben:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can
>> find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated
>> postings, and try to find patterns with some
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can
> find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated
> postings, and try to find patterns with some black
> shell-magic.
Is "sa-learn --spam
Hi,
* Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-24 14:31]:
> Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben:
>
> >The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one
> >in the next days and then lets see what happens.
>
> ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and i
Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben:
>The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one
>in the next days and then lets see what happens.
ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and if it is
useful.)
If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to
[EMAIL
Hallo! Du (Nico Golde) hast geschrieben:
>At the moment the spam-report.pl script uses:
>
>
>
>To identify the message, this wouldn't work with a MUA so the idea came
>to my mind was to identify the Mail with the message-ID.
>Paskal Hakim asked what happens if someone fakes the message-ID in the
15 matches
Mail list logo
