Re: massive bug report to replace !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 kludges with dpkg wildcards

2011-07-18 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Robert Millan wrote: Title and template description (below) is self-explanatory. 156 packages are affected (list is attached). Package: %package% Severity: wishlist User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd The debian/control file in %package% uses a negated list of

Re: massive bug report to replace !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 kludges with dpkg wildcards

2011-07-17 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:58:28 +0200 Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote: Title and template description (below) is self-explanatory. 156 packages are affected (list is attached). More usefully, the dd-list of the packages is attached. -- Neil Williams =

Re: massive bug report to replace !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 kludges with dpkg wildcards

2011-07-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 17 juillet 2011 à 07:13 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit : Debian Evolution Maintainers pkg-evolution-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org evolution Already fixed in experimental. Debian GNOME Maintainers pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org libproxy (U) Will be in

Re: massive bug report to replace !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 kludges with dpkg wildcards

2011-07-17 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 07/17/2011 08:13 AM, Neil Williams wrote: More usefully, the dd-list of the packages is attached. Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org gpsd zbar Both fixed in git, will be included in the next upload. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer

massive bug report to replace !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 kludges with dpkg wildcards

2011-07-16 Thread Robert Millan
Title and template description (below) is self-explanatory. 156 packages are affected (list is attached). Package: %package% Severity: wishlist User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd The debian/control file in %package% uses a negated list of architectures to specify a package

Re: massive bug report to replace !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 kludges with dpkg wildcards

2011-07-16 Thread Robert Millan
I forgot to CC debian-hurd, please follow-up there too. 2011/7/16 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: Title and template description (below) is self-explanatory.  156 packages are affected (list is attached). Package: %package% Severity: wishlist User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags:

Re: massive bug report to replace !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 kludges with dpkg wildcards

2011-07-16 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, Alle sabato 16 luglio 2011, Robert Millan ha scritto: 2011/7/16 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: The debian/control file in %package% uses a negated list of architectures to specify a package relationship (most likely Build-Depends) on a Linux-specific package. I.e. something like:

Re: massive bug report to replace !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 kludges with dpkg wildcards

2011-07-16 Thread Robert Millan
2011/7/17 Pino Toscano toscano.p...@tiscali.it: User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd I'd use some different usertag for this, as it is IMHO not that specific to kbsd (even if it will matter for you soon, it seems); this way this migration (and any other usage of wildcard