On 29 October 2013 13:34, Aron Xu wrote:
>
> It would require much more resource to spend on making more ports,
> this means more build machines and man power, which is not sufficient
> at mean time.
>
>
True. I hopefully have some resource coming online, and I may also have
some in-house build h
On 29 October 2013 13:40, Aron Xu wrote:
>
> What we are running isn't any of them, and the 2-way server board
> looks promising.
>
> Thanks both. OK, so I've no details from Loongson about the boards they
have for me yet either - I suspect it may be the same as your board.
What we need to consi
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Graham Whaley wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29 October 2013 13:34, Aron Xu wrote:
>>
>>
>> It would require much more resource to spend on making more ports,
>> this means more build machines and man power, which is not sufficient
>> at mean time.
>>
>
> True. I hopefully ha
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Graham Whaley wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29 October 2013 11:50, YunQiang Su wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> > Nice. Can I ask which board that is? I have some boards reserved for me
>> > in
>> > Loongson that I am highly likely to purchase, and suspect (but would
>> > like to
>> > c
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Graham Whaley wrote:
> On 25 October 2013 17:22, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
>> After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port
>> almost done.
>> Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully.
>> The current build status can be found in ht
On 29 October 2013 11:50, YunQiang Su wrote:
[snip]
> > Nice. Can I ask which board that is? I have some boards reserved for me
> in
> > Loongson that I am highly likely to purchase, and suspect (but would
> like to
> > confirm) that they are the same board that you are using. I will also
> check
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:22 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
>> After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port
>> almost done.
>> Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully.
>
> Congrats!
>
> Please create a page on t
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Graham Whaley wrote:
> On 25 October 2013 17:22, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
>> After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port
>> almost done.
>> Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully.
>> The current build status can be found in ht
On 25 October 2013 17:22, YunQiang Su wrote:
> After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port
> almost done.
> Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully.
> The current build status can be found in http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/
>
Hey! - well done. That's qui
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:22 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port
> almost done.
> Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully.
Congrats!
Please create a page on the Debian wiki and or update the MIPSPort
wiki page about this
After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port
almost done.
Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully.
The current build status can be found in http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/
Now I get a new board and give it 18GiB DDR3 memory and 1TB hardisk.
Most important i
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> hi!
>
> On 10/15/2013 03:59 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
The buildlog of these packages can be found in
http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/
>
>
> Looking at one of my pet packages (gpsd):
>
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencie
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:33 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
>> We are working on the port of mips64el, and the progress is quite good.
>
> Please add that to debian-ports.org so that maintainers can find
> failed build logs linked from the PTS and wor
hi!
On 10/15/2013 03:59 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>> The buildlog of these packages can be found in
>>> http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/
Looking at one of my pet packages (gpsd):
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: pps-tools (>=
0.20120406+g0deb9c7e-2~)
but I don't see that build
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Javier Vasquez
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>> We are working on the port of mips64el, and the progress is quite good.
>>
>> Are they compiled with "n64" abi, or with "n32" ab
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Javier Vasquez
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>> We are working on the port of mips64el, and the progress is quite good.
>
> Are they compiled with "n64" abi, or with "n32" abi? The arch name is
> confusing at times.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> We are working on the port of mips64el, and the progress is quite good.
Are they compiled with "n64" abi, or with "n32" abi? The arch name is
confusing at times.
Thanks,
Javier.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debi
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:33 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> We are working on the port of mips64el, and the progress is quite good.
Please add that to debian-ports.org so that maintainers can find
failed build logs linked from the PTS and work on fixing the issues.
Until you are able to add mips64el to
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 2013-10-15 12:33, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>
>> http://192.168.252.248/attempted/0_attempted.txt
sorry for me, it should be
http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/0_attempted.txt
>> is the list of packages which have tried to build while failed,
On 2013-10-15 12:33, YunQiang Su wrote:
http://192.168.252.248/attempted/0_attempted.txt
is the list of packages which have tried to build while failed,
which is so called attempted in sbuild.
That's a private IP address, so not that helpful to others. :-) There
is a file named "0_atte
We are working on the port of mips64el, and the progress is quite good.
We have about 11000 packages to build for this port.
About 2666 packages are not in build queue, due to lack of build-deps
About 695 packages are building or waiting or attempted
or failed to build due to so
21 matches
Mail list logo
