On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Gergely,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Just to chime in, not saying that maintaining a consistent state between
architectures is an easy thing and presents no problems, but Debian is
the only
* Clint Byrum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 18:15]:
Please understand.. I want Debian to be great. I want it to release
when it is ready. Under the current system, being ready means achieving
an enormous number of goals that benefit a very small number of users.
For sarge, the number of
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:01 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Clint Byrum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 18:15]:
Please understand.. I want Debian to be great. I want it to release
when it is ready. Under the current system, being ready means achieving
an enormous number of goals that benefit a
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 20:33 +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:13:20AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
I feel your pain. Its hard to keep all these buildd's for different
architectures up. That goes to the very heart of my point.
I'm not saying Debian should totally
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people /still/ try it.
The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people /still/ try it.
The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use google if you want to know
why.
You're ignoring people arguing the other side of the issue. For example,
in [EMAIL PROTECTED], I
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:33:05AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???) and said these are not going to release with
the rest of sarge? Would it reduce the time to test the installer? Any
RC bugs that were
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:36 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has
Hi Gergely,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Just to chime in, not saying that maintaining a consistent state between
architectures is an easy thing and presents no problems, but Debian is
the only distribution that supports all these many architectures. This
has
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 14:36 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 17:58 -0500, schreef Joey Hess:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people /still/ try it.
The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use google if you want to know
why.
You're ignoring people arguing the
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I very well remember that mail. The key word in Clint's mail that
prompted my reply was 'current' (problems). d-i has been ported to all
our architectures now, which required a lot of work, and doing a d-i
release still requires quite some work to synchronise that among
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 07:20:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
If the build fails on sparc, arm, and s390, how should this be
indicative that we should drop s390, mipsel, and hppa?
mipsel is a little wrong in this list. We had some hardware problems on
the 2 mipsel buildds (Same Machine,
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:35 +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 07:20:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
If the build fails on sparc, arm, and s390, how should this be
indicative that we should drop s390, mipsel, and hppa?
Wow what a flurry of discussion that message
Clint Byrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:35 +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 07:20:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
If the build fails on sparc, arm, and s390, how should this be
indicative that we should drop s390, mipsel, and hppa?
Wow
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mipsel is a little wrong in this list. We had some hardware problems on
the 2 mipsel buildds (Same Machine, Same Manuf. Date, Same time PSU
defect) and it took a while to get at least one up. The short-after
death of one of the machines went past me
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:13:20AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
I feel your pain. Its hard to keep all these buildd's for different
architectures up. That goes to the very heart of my point.
I'm not saying Debian should totally abandon all the work done by the
various architecture teams. But to
19 matches
Mail list logo
