Re: missing package conflicts

2008-04-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 08:58:52PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: I will file bugs soon (hopefully before leaving on [VAC] on 18/4). One interesting question is: against which of the conflicting packages should the bug be filed? The less popular one according to popcon? The more recent one in the

missing package conflicts

2008-04-16 Thread Ralf Treinen
Hi, The following list contains packages that fail to install at the same time since one package tries to overwrite a file owned by the other package: http://edos.debian.net/missing-conflicts/ In these package pairs, (at least) one of the two packages must declare a conflict with the other

Re: missing package conflicts

2008-04-16 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 02:58:52 pm Ralf Treinen wrote: Hi, The following list contains packages that fail to install at the same time since one package tries to overwrite a file owned by the other package: http://edos.debian.net/missing-conflicts/ In these package pairs, (at least) one

Re: missing package conflicts

2008-04-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:44 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote: snip I'd be interested in seeing how there can be 75 package pairs with shared file names which coinstall successfully. In the case of a Replaces making that possible, I'd say that the package with files being replaced should

Re: missing package conflicts

2008-04-16 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:20:21PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:44 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote: snip I'd be interested in seeing how there can be 75 package pairs with shared file names which coinstall successfully. In the case of a Replaces making that